In the past important knowledge of culture and history was stored in museum Nowadays information is freely available on internet therefore is no longer need for museum To what extent do you agree or disagree

Museums store the traditions and history of our ancestors. As alot of information regarding this is already available online, some people believe that museums should not exist anymore. However, I entirely disagree with this notion because museums allow one to watch in person the belongings of famous people from the past and enable us to learn more about their lives.

To begin with, museums open the doors to the past because they contain in them the essential and special things of our ancestors. By visiting one, one can actually see the things used by them and store them in their mind. The items seen in peroson have huge impact on one than the ones seen in images. Therefore, they can motivate one to learn more about their ancestors. For instance, National Museum of Lahore has in it the belongings of Mughal Emperors. So, one can vividly imagine how our elders spent their lives, what were their interests and much more.

Although the online media has all the information of the past and our culture, one can only see the images without touching them actually. When one touches them it gives special feelings regarding their users and makes one emotional which is highly unlikely by just viewing the images, and it creates a special and stronger bond of one with their elders who are not physically with them anymore. Moreoever, as their is plenty of information available on the internet, one struggles with identifying the real information because false information is also there. Hence, visiting the museum can never be replaced by just reading about it online.

To conclude, even though internet is an easily available and free way of getting information about one's past and culture, it cannot replace the sentiments attached with visiting the museums in person and it cannot allow one to phsyically handle things.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (25 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...useum of Lahore has in it the belongings of Mughal Emperors. So, one can vividly ...
^^
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...ically with them anymore. Moreoever, as their is plenty of information available on t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...d free way of getting information about ones past and culture, it cannot replace the...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, hence, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, for instance, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98371335505 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44952872681 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527687296417 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5556824413 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150690273214 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706381158115 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561153737912 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115152149244 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456150787579 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.