Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an opinion that workers who get a job at an early age and continue to work in the same workplace for the whole work life tend to feel more satisfied with their professions than those who like to alter their occupations frequently. Although this might be somewhat true, job seekers who change their jobs are likely to satisfy their careers more due to some reasons.
Some people believe that having the same job during their lifetime as early age as possible leads employees to feel strongly satisfied with their vocation. Mainly, with long work experiences through the same given tasks, many workers can easily adjust not only work environment given but also effectively communicate with co-workers as they are all familiar with them. Thus, many of them are likely to feel comfortable and less pressured and relatively satisfied.
However, I argue that job applicants who are adventurous enough to change a variety of career paths anytime seem to be pleased with their jobs more often. The first reason is that by modifying and experiencing a vast range of different positions, many job hunters discover what kinds of works are suitable for them and what types of jobs could lead them to have a sense of fulfilment effectively. Hence, when these are carrying out consistently, more workers satisfy their works. Aside from that, as pursuing receiving more salaries, which is one of the significant elements that motivate them to have exceptional joy, a large number of employees prefer to move to different workplaces regularly.
In conclusion, I, by and large, disagree with this statement because there are other factors which employees make them feel satisfied with themselves strongly by keeping changing their occupations.
- The given first pie chart gives information about typical Australian household energy usages while the second pie chart presents the rate of greenhouse gas emissions caused by Australian household which lead to environmental problems 82
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus, do you think that this is a postive or negative development? 61
- The governments should invest more money in science education rather than subjects to develop the country. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- The group below shows average carbon dioxide(CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this option?What sort of punishment should parents and t 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 620, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... motivate them to have exceptional joy, a large number of employees prefer to move to different w...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, thus, in conclusion, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14436619718 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67357881979 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591549295775 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.5234811801 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.1 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234584525838 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991375611378 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698228081534 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142032123727 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698055977452 0.056905535591 123% => OK
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.