Some people think young people should be free to choose their job while others believe that they should be realistic and think about their future Discuss both views and give your opinion

Deciding a job has always been an increasing concern for young people. On the one hand, many people think young people should choose whatever jobs they want. However, others feel they should choose practical jobs. The merits of both arguments will be analyzed before a conclusion is decided upon.
Firstly, some argue young people should pursue their passion even if it is a pipe dream. For example, a favorite job makes people feel inspired when working, increasing their mood for work. When people feel happy with their work, they are likely to boost their productivity significantly. Although this setup leaves job seekers a source of motivation, it does little to consider all the dimensions of someone’s self. Thus, the merits of this opinion are hard to support.
However, many other people urge young people to choose a realistic job and think about the future. To a broader extent, people should consider what job aptitude they have possessed. For example, my friend does want to become a singer but she does not have any innate talent and just has a passion for singing. Moreover, what financial state you are in which is also an important factor that needs to be considered since it helps people to avoid the circumstance that people do not provide themselves with enough money. This results in a decrease in the likelihood of quitting the job to find another decent one instead. Thus, the heightened benefits of this opinion regarding deciding on a job can clearly be seen.
After looking at these two opposing points of view, it is felt that choosing a job swiftly without any thorough thinking is not a sustainable way to have a better life in the future. Thus, it is hoped that they will have a better look at themselves in terms of every aspect when deciding on a job.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81493506494 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48455127225 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558441558442 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1556206662 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2352941176 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396819564295 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126419319961 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103105319152 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234476513064 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887418084197 0.056905535591 156% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.