When a country develops its technology the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. Do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Firstly, the farming equipment’s are totally changed in this modern era as compare to past. For example, in past time farmers have to toil hard because there was no source to do farming without hands, but now, with the help of technology they are complete their work in a few hours and save their precious time. As a result, technology uplift the standard of work which is worthwhile for every individuals. Moreover, it also pave the way of communication among people. For instance, masses take help of letters and STD or ISD to communicate with each other in the past. But in these modern world individuals use mobile to talk with their kith and kins in every nook and corner of the world. It brings joy and prosperity in every people life. Furthermore, gone are the days jobs are easily available but difficult. Like, in banks individuals have to do lots of work without any electronic gadgets by which they have to suffer from stress but in this modern era, workers do their work with the help of computers or laptops. So that, it helps to relief their stress and easily cover their work. Last but not the least, in these modern world no one imagine their life without transportation by which people easily travel one place to another place which is beyond comparison, but gone are the days people have to walk or travel on bull curts to visit one place to another which consume lots of time and individuals have to face different type of problems while traveling.
To recapitulate, technology spread its roots all over the world, which make people’s life more comfortable and entertaining.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...era as compare to past. For example, in past time farmers have to toil hard because there...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 431, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'paves'?
Suggestion: paves
...or every individuals. Moreover, it also pave the way of communication among people. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78057553957 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64833472739 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55035971223 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.2612815777 49.4020404114 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.75 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0919941841694 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371255014168 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260388168008 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822875883363 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00363521491539 0.056905535591 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.