In the contemporary era, it is often noticed that the underaged migrate to urban areas from remote places for numerous causes. Education and job opportunities are the most prominent among them. There exist both benefits and drawbacks in the context of this situation. This essay examines both views full-fledged and in the furtherance declares which is overshadowed.
Firstly, let us discuss the positive aspects of this development. Although it is tough to leave your native place and accustom to a new environment, the youth is extensively fascinated regarding the idea of moving to a city for higher studies. Besides embracing some of the best institutions they also offer practical exposure related to study. Moreover, almost all the major industries and companies are situated in major towns rather than villages. These provide a huge number of jobs for the young who are desperate to earn a living. For instance, Delhi is the hub for automobile industries whereas, Banglore is the heart of software companies in the country. So, the youth are more likely to evolve and prosper.
On the contrary, there are some shortcomings. The urban environment has many grim effects on the lives of residents. Prolonged traffic jams and increasing pollution makes these places tough to live. For example, even though Dubai is a well-developed area it has enormous amounts of pollution. Also, people of these places experience many health hazards ranging from physical illness to fatal diseases. A medical survey states that cities have low average lifetimes and high death rates compared to villages. Thus, urban life lacks the peace of living compared to villages.
Now, let us summarize the above discussion. Urban mobilization is a trending situation but has both advantages and disadvantages nonetheless. But obviously the former outnumber the latter. Hence, it can be concluded that it is majorly beneficial anyhow.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32236842105 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90171855421 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638157894737 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3798377127 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.5454545455 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8181818182 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109778255722 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.02429260929 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291495217606 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591588355761 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0117972064576 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.98 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.