In the contemporary era, where mobile phones have the utmost prominence in the field of communication, people quite frequently use them whenever and wherever they want. This fascinating technology do have both great and grim influences on a single person and the society. This essay will closely examine both the sides and in furtherance decides which side has the upper hand.
First, let us put a light on the beneficial effects. One of the major benefits is that extensive exchange of information has become a piece of cake despite the humongous distances to be covered. Eventually this brought us together like never before and no one can ever sense loneliness. Also at critical situations and emergencies mobiles have been proving themselves as lifesavers. For example, a single text message can save the life of a person met with an accident. Thus they have proven their prominence.
Now, we will hurtle towards the ill effects. Even though these gadgets are advantageous in many aspects, there prevail some disadvantages too. Over the top usage of these devices causes enormous amount of radiation which in turn disrupts environment and the flora and fauna living in it. It wouldn't be surprising to comprehend the fact that due to this many of us are facing neural problems. Moreover, most of the citizens are overly possessed by them wasting lot of precious time. In this way they have some devastating effects too.
Cellular phones offer some undeniable favours which can save the day. Also, they cause some damage to the users and the eco system. Finally, when both the sides are assessed,, it is obvious that the positive effects outweighs the negative effects. Hence, mobiles phones are mobile phones are mostly beneficial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e and no one can ever sense loneliness. Also at critical situations and emergencies ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... life of a person met with an accident. Thus they have proven their prominence. N...
^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...nd the flora and fauna living in it. It wouldnt be surprising to comprehend the fact th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
...inally, when both the sides are assessed,, it is obvious that the positive effects...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67538958349 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643356643357 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4693046636 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5789473684 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0526315789 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36842105263 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230716384595 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601113269017 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533985801002 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13291647802 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534275102029 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.