In the contemporary era, the usage of computers for learning has been extensively increasing. Nonetheless, this became a debatable situation. Although somebody thinks it is beneficial, others comprehend that this has grim effects on the students. This essay will parse both the perceptions and in furtherance declares my opinion. I, however, consider this advancement as a boon to the knowledge seekers because it can be accessed any time and anywhere unlike classroom lectures.
The services of the technology in the field of education has proven to be undeniable, as e-learning enhanced and revolutionized the children's study by providing bountiful information regarding discrete concepts. Digital and video lectures make Learners flexibly absorb even the most convoluted topics like a cakewalk. This saves a lot of time and effort required to accomplish some complicated tasks. For example, digital classes have numerous visual examples with three-dimensional figures which enables the pupil to imagine and correlate many things.
Over-dependence on electronic gadgets may lead to the disruption of the imagination of the children. On the contrary to the former advantages, it is a canonical fact that it makes students inactive. Eventually, children will be unable to work hard being overly dependent on the internet. Also, the discussion and exchange of information among the learners diminish. For instance, pupils no longer refer different books for assignments and projects, instead, they would just copy some information from the internet.
Considering and keenly examining all the above-cited information, this issue has both pros and cons. Nevertheless, It is quite obvious that the positives overshadow the disadvantages. Hence, it can be concluded that the use of this technology is most advantageous in knowledge enhancement, despite some minor shortcomings.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, regarding, so, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26401999544 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657142857143 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6906916266 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8823529412 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195885863915 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553418616552 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409708863459 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1120094077 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532177396972 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.