Recently, the phenomenon of offspring’s entertaining activities and the impacts of its type, either educational aim or merely amusement, has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many believe, children spend a great deal of time playing, hence their playtime should have an educational goal. Others are the opinion of the enjoyment time of children per se has a latent educational effect. In my mind, learning is a progressive deed, which will occur over the years, since we were toddlers to the end of our life.
On the one hand, ambitious and idealistic, most of the people who believe, as human beings we live for a constrained period on the earth, therefore there is no convincing reason to expend time with the aim of mere leisure. Furthermore, they are firmly convinced that learning ability will shrink since it has a contradictory trend with age.
On the other hand, the other group argues that every movement of a child has a great goal behind the scene. Consistent with this idea, scholarly findings indicate that activities, for the sake of education and during the five years of a human life cycle, could impose an unprecedented negative efficacy on the mind, in which the likelihood of learning eagerly at the beginning of school time will dwindle sharply. Moreover, stress is another factor that can cause serious difficulties, as the learning process and task achievement will cause stress and anxiety.
To sum up, despite the compelling reasons of both sides of the debate, I opt to vigorously support the idea of letting children live in their colorful world, which is free from any imposing aimed tasks. However, the intrinsic learning capability of the human being cannot be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...al aim or merely amusement, has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many believe, children...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10992907801 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81094752434 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631205673759 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.4447765338 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13000974082 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468619464276 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347876100076 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785263212246 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267869108357 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.