Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Although some people think that telling lies sometimes is irrelevant, I agree with the idea that being candid is essential in any relationship.

First of all, being honest makes any relationship stronger. People need to trust in others. When you find a friend, or a partner, you always are expecting the other person to be honest. As you are knowing better the other person, you realized how honest he is. If you find a person who always tells you the truth, you strenght your tie with him. For instance, when the former president of the United States, Barack Obama met his current wife, Michelle at the university, he found a woman who was very honest with him. She did not try to be another person to please to Barack. With the time, this couple trusted each other because they were always being sincere with their feelings. As a result, they felt in loved with each other and got married. In this way, they have developed a solid relationship as we all can see trough the media.

Second, not telling the truth can cause serious problems. Without a doubt, some lies may bring a lot of troubles, especially if they affect people. These situations can be so controversial, that some acts of dishonesty can be controversial and appear on the media. Moreover, the protagonists may even go to jail. For instance, at the beginning of this year there was a scandal regarding to the admissions process of prestigious universities. Some wealthy parents payed sports coaches to falsify some documents which proved the outstanding abilities of their children. One of these parents was the famous actress Felicity Hoffmann. She is in trial and is accused of soborn. Now she is in a huge problem and her freedom is threathened. In addition, her reputation is on the floor. All this problematic situation was provoked by her dishonest act.

In summary, telling the truth and being transparent is fundamental because it benefit a salutary relationship and we avoid having problems.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are always
...en you find a friend, or a partner, you always are expecting the other person to be honest...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[4]
Message: The verb know is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'know'
Suggestion: know
...g the other person to be honest. As you are knowing better the other person, you realized h...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...g the other person to be honest. As you are knowing better the other person, you realized h...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uth and being transparent is fundamental because it benefit a salutary relationsh...
^^
Line 13, column 80, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'benefits'?
Suggestion: benefits
... transparent is fundamental because it benefit a salutary relationship and we avoid ha...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, then, for instance, in addition, in summary, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91369047619 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73456682596 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580357142857 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.726805239 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.7826086957 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6086956522 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17391304348 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163517706483 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435767582664 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598839685585 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106468733867 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530949452332 0.0645574589148 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.