Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
In today's complex and progressive world, communication plays an essential role in people's life. In university or a job, people should have communicated in different fields to succeed in their projects. Nowadays, individuals try different techniques for being in touch with each other. Some people prefer to communicate by e-mail with their classmates or colleagues about a project. Others prefer to prefer to meet face to face. From my vantage point, communicating in person with our colleagues is more effective than e-mails. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will discuss in the following essay.
First of all, communicating by e-mails has a high risk of making mistakes, and other people cannot get accurate messages. Some time writing passages cannot describe the correct meaning to other persons, and it can change the meaning. Most of the time, even one word can change the meaning, or because of tiredness, people cannot read correctly and understand what we are talking about. Moreover, people can explain their purpose face to face more easily. For example, when I was a university student, I had lots of projects. We should do them in a group at the end of the term. We used to get together and share our information and data. Then we get a good result. One time, I tried it by sending several messages, and my classmate misunderstood my information. We had to try it again and face to face.
Secondly, time is an important factor in doing projects. Most of the time, doing projects from long distances and with e-mail can waste peoples' time. For instance, sending an e-mail will take much more time than communicating face to face. Some time to clarify our massage we have to several e-mails. Beginning with thinking of suitable words to write, sending the e-mail, and waiting for the partner to do the same thing can take too much time. On the contrary, in a face-to-face meeting, people can talk for an hour and explain every minute detail to each other.
In conclusion, from my point of view, it's better classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person for two main reasons. First, it decreases the risk of making mistakes in projects, and second, students or employees can save more time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'prefer to'.
Suggestion: prefer to
...s or colleagues about a project. Others prefer to prefer to meet face to face. From my vantage poin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udents or employees can save more time.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, talking about, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87631578947 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71623185911 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518421052632 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0511091852 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.12 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215109665601 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646903661368 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839941189223 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157446253406 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661033929906 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.