Artist finance support
The article discussed that artist should get government fundings. However, the professor opposes this argument. Both, reading and lecture, provide three reasons: living support, government grants and public investment.
According to the passage, now a says it’s more difficult for experimental artists to support themselves. Nevertheless the speaker disputes it and says that there are jobs made for this type of artists, such as being an art teacher.
The article claims that the government should give grants to artist while they develop a project. The professor cast out on this argument by explaining its not fair that artist get special treatment, because their work is just as important as other professions.
As the text states, a study showed that spending government funds on the arts is a good investment. On the other hand the lecturer believes that it’s not, because the study only applies to groups, not individuals and it would be a waste of money.
Generally speaking, the reading and the listening are both about the finances of artists. The three main points in the passage are challenged by the artist, supporting his point of view. Now that you have been presented with all the facts you can make your own conclusion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a say' or simply 'says'?
Suggestion: a say; says
...tment. According to the passage, now a says it’s more difficult for experimental ar...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...rimental artists to support themselves. Nevertheless the speaker disputes it and says that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s not, because the study only applies to groups, not individuals and it would be ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 203.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18226600985 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67005071341 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645320197044 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2031871591 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6666666667 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9166666667 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257765682993 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791643387264 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792737985522 0.0662205650399 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120336899237 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680267601711 0.0443174109184 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.