what
Despite the short-term benefits of working four days a week for employees, which is being less error-prone and taking much more time into their personal life, it increases multiple risks such as losing their jobs or the chance of a promotion.
That is because having more employees will rise extra fixed-costs for companies, such as welfare, health insurances, more workspace and more training costs, which does not depend on the work-week length.
So in case of an economic turn-down, the four-days a week employees are more likely to lose their jobs.
Even in the case of need for a new manager, companies are more likely to prefer a full-week manager rather than the other option. So there is probably a lot less chance for a four-days a week employee to get a raise in salary or a promotion in position.
In addition to all that is said above, with the risk of loosing jobs raising, and therefore decreased job stability, in addition to the risks such as companies' high expectation of those employees(i.e expecting the full amount of work in one less day), will overcome the benefits of spending one more day a week for the family.
As a matter of fact, the option is not even presentable in favour of decreasing the costs for companies, as it is proven to increase them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 76 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | TiOluwani97 | 87 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | 200suranjan | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Yash Mehta | 75 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | nusybah | 85 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, in addition, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77130044843 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67997910458 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569506726457 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.3076890575 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.0 110.228320801 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8571428571 21.698381199 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 53.8541721854 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.