In many cities, people can build houses and buildings freely in many styles. Do the ad. outweigh the disad.?

Essay topics:

In many cities, people can build houses and buildings freely in many styles. Do the ad. outweigh the disad.?

In many cities, people can design style and erect houses or buildings as the way they want. While there are several benefits of this freedom, I would argue that its drawbacks are more significant.
On the one hand, building houses according to personal architecture is more likely to create a great deal of unique buildings, which could help to boost tourism in these areas. A city with various types of houses or office buildings, for example, normally draws more attention of visitors than a place that has the same architectures. In addition, since individuals build houses based on their personal preference, they might have a chance to represent their artistic taste. This would make the architecture of houses in these cities getting more diversity.
On the other hand, I suppose that the advantages are outweighed by the disadvantages. Firstly, erecting houses or office buildings in different styles is able to make traditional or cultural values of these cities disappear. Take Hoi An city, which is one of the most ancient cities in the world, as an example. People living there are encouraged to preserve their old houses or construct new houses in traditional architectural styles. That is why this city keep maintaining cultural values. If people living in Hoi An built houses or office buildings in various styles, It would be difficult for this city to preserve and maintain their cultural values.
In conclusion, whereas erecting houses or office buildings based on people’s reference have several benefits, I would argue that its drawbacks are more significant.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-11-27 kevin nguyen 56 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, whereas, while, for example, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20703125 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84020372547 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7370221432 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.538461538 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24687898407 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929109764073 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099507934021 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163772849064 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587618559159 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.