Reading and listening about bears.
The article talks about the aggressive nature of bears towards humans and also explains the ways in which an individual can protect themselves when they are attacked by bears. Whereas, the audio casts doubt on the nature of bears and also reveals the misconceptions of protecting oneself when attacked by a bear.
First, the article claims that bears are naturally aggressive towards humans.When bears live in close proximity to humans and fed by humans, they do not fear humans. Instead they consider humans to be their food source and attack them. The lecturer casts doubt by stating an example where 7000 people coexisted peacefully with 21 bears in just 7 square miles. These bears were hand fed by the community and there were no attacks.
Second, the article states that bears show aggression by standing on their hind legs or by growling,huffing and sometimes even slapping the ground. The lecturer invalidates this statement by saying that bears stand on their hind legs to get a better view. Bears growl and huff to establish their dominance and to avoid a fight. The lecturer asserts that bears are not naturally aggressive.
Third, the article put forward ways to escape a bear attack while the lecture puts forth different ways to deal with an attack. The article says that when a bear attacks, we must run as fast as we can and climb a tree. But, the lecturer says that running will only provoke the bear even more to attack and bears can run as fast as racehorses and climb trees easily with their large claws. He suggests that it is best to talk to the bear and hold your hands high above you and then slowly back away. If the bear charges towards you, cover your head and neck and play dead. The article says that if all fails, use a gun and shoot the bear several times while the lecturer says that bears attack people when shot and it is better to use a non lethal pepper spray.
Therefore, the lecture clearly disagrees with the misconceptions stated in the reading passage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-02 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | prakriti malla | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | prakriti malla | 71 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | prakriti malla | 71 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | prakriti malla | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: When
...are naturally aggressive towards humans.When bears live in close proximity to humans...
^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...ssive towards humans.When bears live in close proximity to humans and fed by humans, they do no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...fed by humans, they do not fear humans. Instead they consider humans to be their food s...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , huffing
...anding on their hind legs or by growling,huffing and sometimes even slapping the ground....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, therefore, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 7.30242825607 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 350.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74285714286 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37452465705 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528571428571 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6252175932 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6470588235 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 7.06452816374 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0320138801746 0.272083759551 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0131233892173 0.0996497079465 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365168697284 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0350370728526 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430327781741 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.