Some people say that holding sport competitions causes many troubles. Others disagree.
Discuss both views.
A very visible difference of opinion has been marked amongst individuals opinion about organizing game events. Some individuals in this regard having a confined narrative that it increases burden on state economy. Opponents, however, have a different narrative and they believe these kind of activities boost sport tourism. Upcoming paragraphs proffers an insight into the both doctrines with the pragmatic emphasis that sport events help the county's economy to improve by spectators rush towards host country.
Not endorsed by everyone, albeit, still attested by many individuals that hosting game tournaments creates burden on host country. This belief is normally quoted with a perception that country has to organize and do preparation which cost fairly large amount. According to them, state bears extra cost in form of security and hospitality arrangement of players from around the world. We have found the advocates of this belief mainly amongst the individuals.
Contrarily, the idea of game competitions is unbiasedly supported by many individuals ranging from intellectuals to the common men. The fundamental argument in support of hosting such events is, it drastically increases state economy by spectators visit to hosting country.
Another striking yield in favor of organizing sport contests is, host country gain publicity in the whole world. Beside attending the event visitors visit different places and become aware of the culture of the host country which makes them popular in the rest of the world.
Conclusively, thought polarization about hosting sport tournaments cannot be settled by heavy arguments on both sides. But what has emerged as more rational after analysis of both views, the stance of financial and popularity boost to hosting nation sounds more rational and appropriate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... a different narrative and they believe these kind of activities boost sport tourism. Upco...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 513, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y spectators rush towards host country. Not endorsed by everyone, albeit, still ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, as to, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.559566787 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80477768827 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602888086643 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8938402973 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0917491286559 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310833905614 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299241875044 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0508354866248 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286423207162 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.