Students prefer doing part-time jobs during their studies. What are the advantages or disadvantages of this?
On several occasions, when we enter a restaurant or receive a home delivery, a student wearing a work cloak is on the other end providing the service. Why are they doing part-time jobs at this young age? This essay throws light into the positive and negative aspects of this scenario and substantiates this growing trend of part-time job among teenagers.
The youth reap a lot of benefits by working part-time. The extra source of income aids them in supporting the family besides covering their own expenses. If a student is prudent enough to acquire a position in a field relevant to his/her study, then the work experience elevates the standard of his/her resume. Effective time management is another take away of great value. Furthermore, an organised lifestyle impedes the youth from indulging in undesirable activities.
Working while studying leaves the students with less or no time to glam up their hobbies or talents. Needless to mention the pressure to be handled at a tender age, which is the fruitful era of life. In addition to this, a recent survey conducted by the sophomores of the PSG College of Management confirmed that the academic output of youngsters with part-time job is not on par with their counterparts who don’t have one.
As the advantages outweigh the drawbacks of having a part-time work, the students prefer to take up an additional chore. However, care should be exercised in choosing the nature and location of the job so that the educational needs are taken care of.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-07 | keyng | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | keyng | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-02 | shain | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-04 | Sarabjeet 9119 | 67 | view |
| 2020-02-04 | sarabsandhu | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'reaps'.
Suggestion: reaps
...t-time job among teenagers. The youth reap a lot of benefits by working part-time....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99209486166 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78216511915 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644268774704 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.086097648 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1538461538 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322131756631 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101472285303 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900951566406 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180586802243 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062590551506 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.