Line graph
The given line graph demonstrates how many international tourists pay visits to three destinations in a certain European nation in the two-decade period starting from the year 1987.
Overall, while the number of foreign visitors came to the country’s coast and mountains experienced an upward trend in spite of some fluctuations, a nosedive could be seen in that of abroad travelers visited the lakes after having hit the highest point. However, over the time framed, the quantity of traveling foreigners spending time on the coastal area registered the highest figures out of three examined groups.
In 1987, the number of overseas visitors reaching to the mountainous regions stood at 20 thousand. After increasing moderately, this figure turned back to its start yet quickly made a fluctuating recovery then and rising to approximately 35 thousand people at the end of the course. Likewise, despite starting the period at 40 thousand prior to having a slight decline, that of who visited the coast still maintained a relatively consistent growth with some inconsiderable variations. This figure, in the end, hit the peak of an estimatedly 75 thousand people to be the highest one overall and double that of its begin.
On the other hand, the number of overseas tourists to the lakes reached its peak at 75 thousand to be the highest figure out of three noticed categories in the year 2002. Nevertheless, this figure soon slumped to merely 50 thousand in 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rd trend in spite of some fluctuations, a nosedive could be seen in that of abroad travele...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, nevertheless, so, still, then, while, as to, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15416666667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8999970067 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579166666667 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.843117449 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.444444444 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4444444444 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0556432848939 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0243901056454 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689856363829 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0548777377022 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950510299046 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.