Arts Financial support
The reading selection and the professor discussed art’s financial support. While the reading mentions it is difficult for artists to support themselves financially, the lecturer disagrees. Both reading and listening show three main points: government funds and patrons, unpopular artists and investment.
According to the passage, artists are funded by governments and private patrons, allowing them to live on while they create their art. However, the lecturer opposes by saying it isn’t fair to treat artists different and show that great artist have existed before governmental grants.
The author of the reading mentions that experimental artists are the ones that need more support because of their lack of commercial potential. Nevertheless, the lecture argues un popular artists can get art related jobs, such as art teachers or commercial artists, to obtain money.
As the text states, art is a good investment, as shown in a study, it generates more money than what it’s spent. On the other hand, the listening clarifies, this study was conducted thought performing artists and sometimes it could be a waste of money.
Generally speaking, although the reading and lecture are both about artist’s financial support, the main points in the passage are challenged by the lecturer by supporting his point of view with various studies. Now you have been presented with all the facts you can make your own conclusion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e both about artist’s financial support, the main points in the passage are chall...
^^
Line 9, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lecturer by supporting his point of view with various studies. Now you have been ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41333333333 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73414622059 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635555555556 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8712113212 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.727272727 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271631525596 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113378020069 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145823278324 0.0662205650399 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143679636892 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805311145815 0.0443174109184 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.