the govements and individuals are spending too much money on national celebrations like new year or festivals. ( To what extend do you agree or disagree)
The management systems and citizen overuse money or energy on special festivals in their nations. Some people spend lots of money on many events and maybe, they think it is their dedication to the nation. I strongly disagree with this action for money support.
Firstly, individuals have lots of types, separated between poverty and richness very ever-deepening. Today's society is increasingly developing, so many rich people appear, but the poor also account for a very high rate. The rich-poor gap is based on many external factors or factors. Back on the issue, the issue of rich and poor will be deeply reflected when the country hosts a festival. According to known information, festivals are held based on funding over 95% of the tax budget and tend to increase steadily over the years, thinking that taxes will continue to increase but human health is decreasing; this means that organizing many festivals will put great pressure on people's lives.
Second, the most directly and severely affected issue must be said to the environment. A country with too many festivals or events uses the national budget to spend it and then, as a result, that money indirectly generates huge amounts of waste after each festival.
According to the VN Express newspaper, each year the amount of waste increases by 2% in Vietnam, and it is worth noting that the amount of waste in the ceremonies accounts for 0.7% and will continue to increase in the future.
Ultimately, the most important thing is to hold a large-scale festival that will have to pay a lot of money and there is a threat to social security and national security. This should come as no surprise, as a large-scale organization will attract a lot of outside attention, especially terrorists or international criminal gangs. Although when preparing to hold the festival, security and defense must be emphasized, that does not mean that there is no loose or unsafe. These participants may pretend to be visitors to attend but deep inside are trying to escape, if discovered, the lives of the participants will be very dangerous.
To sum up, people are always doing what they consider beneficial, bringing a beautiful face to the country. However, if you use excessive resources and money for special events, it will affect people's lives, the environment, even social security, ... Above all, if individuals ad government want to build a nation, then spend money and use resources effectively and bring many benefits to the nation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, then, even so, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 412.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04368932039 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78224142236 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550970873786 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7641276611 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.444444444 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161655578941 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05052223612 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518024187165 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.089247819741 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594636373893 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.