Some people believe that companies should manufacture products that last for a long time. others feel that the emphasis should be placed on producing goods that are cheap.
Several people convince that products have to be produced which is last for a long time. Another opinion believe that the primary things is to manufacture cheap good. In my opinion, i believe that product which good quality is more utilize for people than cheap products.
There are a number of people who live in under-standard some of them do not earn much money. Furthermore to fulfill their need, they have to buy cheap product. In addition, most of population in the world are poor. Hence, some people would prefer to buy cheap product that they can reach it. For instance, the society in Indonesia prefer to purchase vegetables in traditional market than supermarket, because the price of the stuff is still rational.
On the other hand, people believe that products which last for a long time are more utilize to environment and save money. Products which is good quality might have an expensive price, but the products have lasted for a long time, so people do not change or replace products every time. Hence it would be eco-friendly products which help to maintain the balancing on environment. Furthermore, people do not feel worry that the product would be replaced in short time.
In conclusion, some people argue that products have to consist good quality and other said that it has to be cheap price. All of the opinion have their rasional statement but, the product which last for a long time have many benefit even to consumer and environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-09 | amalia hafidah | 56 | view |
| 2021-02-09 | amalia hafidah | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that companies should manufacture products that last for a long time others feel that the emphasis should be placed on producing goods that are cheap 56
- some people believe that companies should manufacture products that last for a long time Others feel that the emphasis should be placed on producing goods that are cheap 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...s last for a long time. Another opinion believe that the primary things is to manufactu...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... manufacture cheap good. In my opinion, i believe that product which good quality...
^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...rd some of them do not earn much money. Furthermore to fulfill their need, they have to buy...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... change or replace products every time. Hence it would be eco-friendly products which...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...her said that it has to be cheap price. All of the opinion have their rasional statement b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, so, still, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in short, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53688312699 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6121299582 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1428571429 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405035118937 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158833404722 0.084324248473 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978728986698 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275009249444 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933602250256 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.