...
It is argued by many that during charitable work, people should be taught to work rather than being given what they need. I partly agree with this statement.
On the one hand, showing people the way to do something could bring about several benefits for individuals and the society as a whole. When the poor are equipped with the necessary knowledge, they could cultivate relevant job skills by themselves and therefore use them to improve their life quality. For example, if a person is shown the techniques how to catch a fish instead of being fed with a single one, he would use the fishing rod to get money from then on as the skills have stayed with him for a lifetime. In this way, more and more people would struggle less to make a living and the government has no need to provide them with necessities due to the fact that they could already purchase them on their own.
Nevertheless, I would argue that this method could not be applied to all situations. Take Vietnam as an example, where there are numerous homeless older people as well as the disabled. In such conditions, they no longer have the ability to take on any work as a result of their physical impairment. Therefore, it is imperative that donors should provide them with basic essentials because they could not carry on living like ordinary people.
In conclusion, although it is of importance to assist needy people with the knowledge and skills to enhance their standard of living, people with mental and physical difficulties should also be taken into consideration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-07 | aceg1000 | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-07 | aceg1000 | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-07 | aceg1000 | 78 | view |
- 56
- Some people believe that a good teamwork makes companies successful Others say that it is more important for companies to have good leaders Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Getting promotion is one of the biggest drives for people to apply themselves and work hard in modern workplace Why do you think people are so driven to get promotion What other factors influence people to work hard 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7947761194 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57081428722 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59328358209 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8923815636 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.818181818 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.