Tell us about yourself and explain your interest in the role.
Since my bachelor’s degree studies, I was engaged in managing engineering projects: our team based on the initial idea of Earth-remote sensing technology developed 2 Cube-based devices, which has been successfully launched at the height of 2 in the atmosphere and 30 kilometers in the stratosphere (link to photos) to monitor the environmental pollution and gas composition of air masses. However, being passionate about technology and high commercial perspectives of the air and space industry, I initiated the change of a project from research-oriented to a commercial and socially significant one, proposing extended functional modules for drones within the UAVext startup. While working in the startup we developed an MVP, won 2 startup competitions (), and received 2 funding support from the accelerator and business angel.
During my experience, I highlighted, that investments in the team are much more important than investments in the products. Thus, underlined focus on people in Seedcamp caught my attention and encouraged me to write this letter. I consider this internship as a unique experience in working daily with a variety of talented teams to improve their products and scale their businesses. I hope, that my previous experience in startups and engineering background will be an asset to your fund.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 752, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...loped an MVP, won 2 startup competitions , and received 2 funding support from the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 204.0 242.827586207 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47058823529 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33208939708 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676470588235 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6551724138 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.452445852 50.4703680194 199% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.428571429 104.977214359 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1428571429 20.9669160288 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.12807881773 48% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.026703220213 0.242375264174 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.01216701779 0.0925447433944 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0199193780117 0.071462118173 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0198721757012 0.151781067708 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0021335013794 0.0609392437508 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.04 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 32.0 9.94827586207 322% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.