it is observed that only a few number of people attend 'Super-Screen-produced' movies than any other movie in a year despite having good reviews by movie critics.
According to the author, it is observed that only a few number of people attend 'Super-Screen-produced' movies than any other movie in a year despite having good reviews by movie critics.
First of all, one needs to understand that for a movie to attract the masses, it should not only have good content, but it also needs to have an appropriate cast, proper screenplay, dialogues, and direction along with proper marketing and PR. Just a movie with 'super-screen-produced' content is not enough to attract audiences to the theatres. Even if a movie is based on a superhero who saves the lives of common people by fighting against a demon enemy, it also should have its principles & morals which should be shown alongside the character of the superhero. people should be able to love not just the content, but also the cast(both main as well as support/side cast) of the movie. The author needs to describe all this statistical data of these 'Super-screen-produced' films' when he's trying to compare them with any other movie released throughout the year.
Secondly, one needs to note that today's date, we have millions of movie critics of different digital as well as non-digital platforms who have different opinions on different things. They also have a different way of rating a specific movie as compared to other critics. Some critics rate movies based on cinematography and screenplay whereas some critics rate movies on the basis of cast or director or the production house from which that specific movie is coming. Looking closely at all the variables, opinions on a specific movie can be positive or negative or sometimes even extremely positive/negative. One also needs to keep in mind that in today's internet era where people need information within a fraction of a second and having no time to even cross-check or verify it from a legitimate and trusted source, it is possible to fake a review of a movie and post it online which creates its positive image in front of the world. There is also a possibility of paying a well-known critic to spread false positive reviews of a movie in order to create its positive impressions all over the internet. Hence instead of trusting online reviews or ignoring the possibility of creating of virtual positive atmosphere author need to validate the quality of the movie with people who have actually seen it in theatres.
So deciding to allocate money for an ad campaign would look like a decision taken in a rush. One needs to sit and evaluate all the aspects of the movie and seriously question 'where we fell short' instead of wasting money on these campaigns and being at point zero again after such a huge expenditure. it will not only turn out as a loss of money but will also turn into a loss to all human efforts which have been made to create such a 'super-screen' movie.
In conclusion, instead of calling it a lack of awareness and spending loads of money on an advertising campaign, the company need to evaluate the performance of actors, directors screenplay-writer and all the crew associated with the film in order to actually improve the 'quality' of content in the 'super-screen-produced' movies so that common man feels to spend his valuable money not just to grab a good content but to also have a mesmerising experience at theatres.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-21 | AtharavBhagwat | 62 | view |
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 11 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 566 350
No. of Characters: 2688 1500
No. of Different Words: 258 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.878 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.749 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.917 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 180 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 136 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 97 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 52 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 40.429 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 19.794 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.786 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.38 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.542 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.156 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
... the author, it is observed that only a few number of people attend Super-Screen-produced ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ongside the character of the superhero. people should be able to love not just the con...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 783, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
... these Super-screen-produced films when hes trying to compare them with any other m...
^^^
Line 6, column 301, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ro again after such a huge expenditure. it will not only turn out as a loss of mon...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 11.1786427146 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 91.0 55.5748502994 164% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2734.0 2260.96107784 121% => OK
No of words: 564.0 441.139720559 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8475177305 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87326216964 4.56307096286 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0277439031 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 204.123752495 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462765957447 0.468620217663 99% => OK
syllable_count: 876.6 705.55239521 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 22.8473053892 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.6513045158 57.8364921388 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.823529412 119.503703932 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.1764705882 23.324526521 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 5.70786347227 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453293430722 0.218282227539 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165599825159 0.0743258471296 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187076762221 0.0701772020484 267% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32342650567 0.128457276422 252% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.283063379606 0.0628817314937 450% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.3799401198 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 48.3550499002 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.197005988 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 98.500998004 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.1389221557 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.