BULLYING referrals

Essay topics:

BULLYING referrals

Even though the fundamental essence of decreased BULLYING referrals at high school emphasizes the significance of SRO, the corresponding impacts of a Geographic Information System such as hotspots, guidance counsellors, and teacher supervisions are acknowledged, and Parent education could be inferred evidently from new policies and successful students, which the potential implications of positive changes as well as safe environments are presumed.

Votes
Average: 2.2 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-12-19 sheimish 22 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, well, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.5418719212 28% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 0.0 20.9802955665 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 31.9359605911 19% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 389.0 1207.87684729 32% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 62.0 242.827586207 26% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.27419354839 5.00649968141 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 2.8060662633 3.92707691288 71% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49270832541 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 51.0 139.433497537 37% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.822580645161 0.580463131201 142% => OK
syllable_count: 119.7 379.143842365 32% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 12.6551724138 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 62.0 20.5024630542 302% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 50.4703680194 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 389.0 104.977214359 371% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 62.0 20.9669160288 296% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 29.0 7.25397266985 400% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151672543551 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151672543551 0.0925447433944 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.071462118173 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151672543551 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 39.1 12.6369458128 309% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -16.83 53.1260098522 -32% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.54236453202 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 31.0 10.9458128079 283% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 19.97 11.5310837438 173% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.61 8.32886699507 175% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 55.0591133005 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 42.0 9.94827586207 422% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 26.8 10.3980295567 258% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 31.0 10.5123152709 295% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.

Rates: 22.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.