getting married before finishing school
It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of getting married and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that marriage prior to job stability or completion of academic path is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that marrying late can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the best marriage age standpoint, marrying at an early age can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that spending more time with one’s beloved partner, as well as counting on the partner’s help are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that girls have numerous restrictions of personal freedom in their own families. Thus, beneficial ramifications of early marriage and starting a family apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of marriage, getting married before 30’s might increase the consequences of quitting higher education due to taking on too much responsibility. Moreover, fundamental aspects of leaving academic education relate to this reality that the demerits of increasing the chances of divorce pertain to youngsters’ maturity levels. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of marrying early in India is correlated negatively with the rapid increase in the birth rate. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of population statistics.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of marrying late far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of taking responsibility, prove the significance of growing to maturity, but also pinpoint life durability.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-01-22 | topraveesh | 88 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 82 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 72 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 82 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1207.87684729 146% => OK
No of words: 320.0 242.827586207 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.528125 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23349021715 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634375 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 379.143842365 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9233823059 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.357142857 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264778294586 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895922815013 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172953024658 0.071462118173 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164109546769 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176942632902 0.0609392437508 290% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.