"The illiterates of the 21st century are not those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn"- Alvin Toffler. Explain the statement and do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays the illiteracy or learning has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether those who cannot read and write are illiterate or those who cannot learn?”. It is a widely held view that learning new methods is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that learning plays a vital role in the fast-changing world than writing and reading. To put into consideration, I express several reasons why I support this issue. First and foremost is that since we have been living in a developing world it is necessary to learn how to use novel technologies. Secondly, it is quite clear that you are not able to utilize intelligent devices just with writing or reading. In addition to this information, a group of scientists, working at a prestigious university conducted that just by reading or writing it would be impossible to use progressive devices, such as ATM or computer.
However, there is no doubt that learning instead of reading and writing provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that reading and writing had been the basis of all science. Moreover, it is quite clear that without having an adequate skill of reading you are not able to learn anything.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that in addition to writing and reading learning as an integral part of literacy must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s the illiteracy or learning has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are hoped to heighten their intellect.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, in addition, no doubt, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02112676056 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92257763417 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584507042254 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4472221354 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.833333333 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26120212181 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793980328929 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112913949273 0.071462118173 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150817159091 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11438710272 0.0609392437508 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.