It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give example.
Recently, the phenomenon of studying a film at school and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of promoting the writing skills is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that raising the awareness in terms of learning literature can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning literature at school by studying a film can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of being an outstanding play writer, as well as the contemporary literature, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between studying a film and learning literature. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both being an accomplished artist and the film director apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of art and science, learning literature by studying a film at school might increase the consequences of the cultural literacy. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the film dialect could relate to this reality that merits of the national literature pertain to developing the children’s skills. As a tangible example, some research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of distracting from school is correlated negatively with watching more films and series.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning literature by studying a film far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being a play writer prove the significance of being famous poetry, but also pinpoint social implications
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46896551724 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20488628131 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579310344828 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.9733202358 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.181818182 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242238769026 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092010939923 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679550956004 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140633639321 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538897188476 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.