Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Or Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind?
Recently, the relationship between medical technologies and humans' life expectancy has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the positive and negative consequences?". Whereas it is a widely held view that medical development is highly beneficial for humans' life, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, humans' life expectancy is bound up inextricably with living longer, which indicates they lead to young generations. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between chronic diseases and genetic problems. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of modern lifestyles is correlated positively with medical treatments.
Within the realm of science and technology, without the slightest doubt, medical developments attribute to modern technologies, in that it would come down to the human health. A salient example of such attribution is psychological effects, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take drug prescription for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint aging' problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the pharmaceutical industry in humans' progress.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of medical technology in humans' life expectancy are of the high importance. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80228136882 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33908287941 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665399239544 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3807508113 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.166666667 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270530585371 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791369327677 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079015246399 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158124962378 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701443561267 0.0609392437508 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.