One way to solve the problem of congestion in cities is to build sky trains which run overhead rather than on or under the ground What are the advantages and disadvantages of using this solution to solve congestion

Essay topics:

One way to solve the problem of congestion in cities is to build sky trains which run overhead rather than on or under the ground.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of using this solution to solve congestion?

Most of the cities in the world are now facing the problem of congestion and long rush hour commute. Governing bodies of crowded cities are actively considering the option of building sky trains. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of overhead rail lines.
The speed of completion for sky train projects is significantly faster compared to surface and underground rail lines. Building ground rail needs acquisition of land to start the work, which can cause significant delay to the project. For example, the metro sky rail project in Singapore was completed in just one year whereas the new ground rail project in Dubai took almost three years to complete. This shows that the sky rail lines can be built significantly faster than ground rail.
There are many consultants who worry about the safety of sky trains. Safety concerns are generally considered as a disadvantage of sky rail commute options. But recent studies show that the advances in latest technology have improved the safety of sky trains. This suggests that sky trains are a good option despite the safety questions.
This essay discussed the advantages and disadvantages of using sky train to solve the congestion in cities. It is clear that the benefits outweigh the disadvantages and sky trains are an effective solution rather than ground and underground commute options.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (6 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the latest'.
Suggestion: in the latest
...t recent studies show that the advances in latest technology have improved the safety of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'solving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: solving
...es and disadvantages of using sky train to solve the congestion in cities. It is clear t...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11764705882 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66720492374 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565610859729 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 379.143842365 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1796854943 50.4703680194 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.0 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53846153846 7.25397266985 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313897908061 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113378484409 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982739606863 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203262149752 0.151781067708 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131164983064 0.0609392437508 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.