Problems and benefits for high school students study plays and works of theatres which were written centuries ago, Discuss and use your own experience.
One of the most contentious issues today relates to how legacy plays and materials which have been taught in schools may cause potential issues for students' development. Some people think that students will learn no creative knowledge, while others maintain that learning old works will help students to embrace their heritage. In this essay, I will explore the positive and negative effects of learning plays and works which were written centuries ago.
To begin with, learning vintage resources will help students to be more appreciated their history. The reason for this is that history is the root of our being, hence a good understanding of our ancestor will create a strong bond between each member in society. In addition, high school students who engage in legacy works and plays often tend to be more enhanced in critical thinking.
On the other hand, I feel just as convinced that taking serious on works which were written long time ago may impact on students' creativity. I often argue that in fact, the lack of creativity will penalise students' career and mental development. Furthermore, the problem of lacking adequate resources for students to learn correctly is also a big major concern for schools. For instance, many books and old works tend to be invalidated or broken because of time, hence it is a challenge for schools to remedy this issue.
In conclusion, despite the pros and cons of learning legacy works. It now has been shown that by studying vintage artworks, students will be equipped with a better mindset about their history and heritage, though they may suffer the lack of creativity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ere written long time ago may impact on students creativity. I often argue that in fact,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, may, so, while, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04460966543 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55206017806 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576208178439 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1286476528 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.083333333 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.25397266985 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265670126047 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099127010195 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742707045638 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155669071169 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802778329137 0.0609392437508 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.