Road rules are generally enforced by fining people for infringements. Some people, however, believe that governments should not be penalized unsafe drivers but reward safe drivers instead.
Which view do you support?
These days, there is an ongoing debate between people about the road safety and reckless drivers. While it is possible to claim that governments should reward those who drive safely instead of punishing those who breach the rules. In my view, this could lead to the myriad of concerns in the society. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analysing both sides of the argument.
First of all, there are several reasons why I am in favour of penalties for breaking the road rules. The most preponderant one is that we cannot deny the risk of death while driving and unsafe drivers can be a big threat to anyone on the road. Therefore, to control the traffic and for the safety of the people, it is advisable to charge people for the road offences. For example, a decade before Saudi Arabia had the highest ratio of road accidents in the world but it has been reduced to the lowest by implementing strict laws and penalties.
On the other hand, those who argue for rewards for safe drivers have a different point view. Firstly, it is claimed that governments can use this system to aware and educate people towards road safety. Secondly, it can also be argued that individuals may tend to adhere to rules and regulation in order to receive a prize from the traffic department which can play a pivotal role in the road safety.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that both options of punishment and reward for drivers can be handy, however, it would be best for the authorities to introduce a balanced system to have an optimum control.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t the road safety and reckless drivers. While it is possible to claim that government...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68705035971 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46581356355 2.71678728327 91% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571942446043 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0061313968 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.583333333 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.25397266985 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299738409767 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974173922266 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560288590957 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171922238005 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274471618916 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.5310837438 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 68.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.