Road rules are generally enforced by fining people for infringements. Some people, however, believe that governments should not be penalized unsafe drivers but reward safe drivers instead.
Which view do you support?
These days, there is an ongoing debate between people about the road rules and reckless drivers. While it is possible to claim that governments should reward those who drive safely instead of punishing those who breach the rules. In my view, a more stable and flexible system is required regarding road rules. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analysing both sides of the argument.
First of all, we cannot deny the risk of death while driving and unsafe drivers can be a big threat to anyone on the road. Therefore, to control the traffic and for the safety of the people, it is advisable to charge people for the road offences. For example, a decade before Saudi Arabia had the highest ratio of road accidents in the world but it has been reduced to the lowest by implementing strict laws and penalties.
On the other hand, It is claimed that the governments can initiate rewards for safe drivers which will not only raise awareness but it will educate and motivate the people towards road rules as well. For instance, countries like Bahrain, UAE have introduced a system of gifts for the good drivers and individuals tend to adhere to rules and regulations in order to receive the prize from the traffic department which can play a pivotal role in the road safety.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that both options of punishment and reward for drivers can be vital, however, it would be best for the authorities to introduce a balanced system to have an optimum control.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ut the road rules and reckless drivers. While it is possible to claim that government...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, regarding, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77358490566 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47960423581 2.71678728327 91% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5687837714 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.5 7.25397266985 200% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336077465143 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117126066932 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597379740875 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187644247018 0.151781067708 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300491446006 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.1260098522 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.5310837438 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.