Some organisations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this.

In the past decade, companies have witnessed fierce competition for survival and growth. Many organizations have adopted innovative and radical management practices to eradicate competition in business. A new collaborative tread has emerged which include both senior management and employees in critical decision-making processes for their strategy of goods and services. Proponents are debating over this phenomenon, many say integrating employees will prove to be game-changing, however, others hold opposite views stating that it will leave detrimental impacts on the growth of the organization. In this article, I will discuss both the positive and negative aspects of this development.

To begin with, many international companies worldwide have ripped enormous benefits by involving employees in the decision-making processes of their goods and services. First, employees are not only connected directly to the market and end customers, but certain shop-floor workers can also give paramount inputs to make a product better than the competitors. For instance, by engaging employees in such brainstorming sessions largest consumer group companies have achieved mammoth sales and revenue growth. Moreover, by integrating employees in such activities keeps them motivated, hence, there could be lower employee turn over ration, which is the biggest challenge nowadays.

On the other hand, there are negligible downsides of this practice, as many time employees miss-use the freedom of decision making and form partial policies which can be dangerous for the organizations. Furthermore, sometime due to lack of experience some critical decisions might back-fire and leaves the company suffering.

In conclusion, from the above example, it is evident that including employees with careful considerations can be boon for the organizations, otherwise, it can be turned in to the ban.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'practices eradicating'.
Suggestion: practices eradicating
...opted innovative and radical management practices to eradicate competition in business. A new collabor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'sessions the largest'.
Suggestion: sessions the largest
...ngaging employees in such brainstorming sessions largest consumer group companies have achieved ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85507246377 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19658042978 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63768115942 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2459728521 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.25397266985 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291451592068 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100556937003 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091185341676 0.071462118173 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156770525528 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798449598175 0.0609392437508 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.