Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? (Agree/Disagree). or Many young people nowadays are imitating celebrities in sports and movies. In your opinion, is this good or bad? Support your

Essay topics:

Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? (Agree/Disagree). or Many young people nowadays are imitating celebrities in sports and movies. In your opinion, is this good or bad? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.

The importance of glamorous movie stars, which has always been debatable, has now raised a lot of argument in favour and against it, thus it has become even more controversial. The substantial influence of sports stars have sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in an integral part of the young kids in recent years. It can be agreed that the upside of celebrities as role models is an instrumental indeed, however it has some drawbacks as well. This essay will elaborate both assertions and provide a well-weighed conclusion.

At the outset, there are various reasons why famous personnels are unreversedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that young people can copy their work ethics and become a better person. For example, a study suggests that students seem to be motivated to study hard after watching many inspirational movies. Therefore, it is certainly a vital time for people to appreciate the significance of glamorous celebrities for the overall amelioration of young students.

However, there are some people who choose to think differently and hold an opposing viewpoint, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of famous sportmen; nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact that fame seems to be a root of the problem which turn people to evil. For example, by watching many reality shows, which featured by Kim family, youngsters start behaving obnoxiously and copying those celebrities' bad habits. Hence, it is apparent that the downside of having too much fame cannot be overlooked.

In the nutshell, the above presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of celebrities and glamorous stars, while it is evident that it has various benefits, its deleterious effects cannot be ingored and have to be addressed and well balanced against its merits.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29530201342 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97901160743 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590604026846 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.6279320258 50.4703680194 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.454545455 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162406502041 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589699271619 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044851567689 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886854760305 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455376398418 0.0609392437508 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.