"According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the last year. Clearly, the content of these reviews is not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not in the quality of our movies but with public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater quantity of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."
The argument stated by the author is based on the report of the marketing department that, increase of positive reviews despite of decrease in people for super screen produced movies. Viewers are not reaching enough of prospective terms and budget should be increased for next movie by advertising more vigorously is a fled statement. Because the other doesn't provide any related evidences to the stated assumption. Only based on the few data of con testers, and draw conclusion based on vague terms like lack of awareness.
Firstly, market department which produces the report shows the few but increased positive reviews comparing from last year. This statement draw up on few statistical data or contests may be unrelated to the subject which marketing department dealing with it. Their is no proper cited evidences to support this assumption. If positive reviews increases then why the movie produced management concern about their prospective viewers. This kind of questions are unanswered by author. For example, the marketing department may review only some people or closed group of people and those reviews doesn't show to actual effect when compared to the overall review. Statistics are missing to support the report.
Percentage of positive reviews are increased mean the public are aware of the content of the movie and production values of producers. But author differential draws the assumption on no related things which are vague. Indeed the producers can suspect about the report of the marketing department rather than comment on public awareness. Increased percentage is above than the last year mean the people has accepted the movies of super screen produced movies more.
Author stated that, public's lack of awareness because they didn't reach their prospective reviews. This is a vague thing and unacceptable thing. Indeed public has much knowledge than their produced movies. For example, when the movies of other production are accepted by public like productions of Warner brothers, Disney land. So, the problem is with the production not with the peoples.
Moreover, author sates the budget should be increased to reach their prospective reviews which is also vague thing. Their is no necessitate to increase budget without actual content which will accepted by people. If, content matters for to increase in budget then it should be increased. Without subjective matter in the movie their is no use in increasing the budget of movie which will results in laws.
On other hand the super screen produced doesn't gains the prospective reviews due to their lack of budget or less production values then the production of budget should be increased. Finally the subject of movies matters whether to increase of budget or not. Then super screen produced may achieve prospective reviews. If author consider this assumption the argument can be strengthened.
Therefore, the author doesn't provide any cited evidences to strengthen the marketing reports, or any valid assumptions to show lack of public awareness. The argument can be strengthen by considering above like assumptions. But author didn't state any such valid assumptions. Considering above unstated assumptions the argument is flawed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ng more vigorously is a fled statement. Because the other doesnt provide any related ev...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... is a fled statement. Because the other doesnt provide any related evidences to the st...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: There
...h marketing department dealing with it. Their is no proper cited evidences to support...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...losed group of people and those reviews doesnt show to actual effect when compared to ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...n on no related things which are vague. Indeed the producers can suspect about the re...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gs which are vague. Indeed the producers can suspect about the report of the mark...
^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Increased percentage is above than the last year mean the people has accepted t...
^^
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ced movies more. Author stated that, publics lack of awareness because they d...
^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... publics lack of awareness because they didnt reach their prospective reviews. This i...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...s a vague thing and unacceptable thing. Indeed public has much knowledge than their pr...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r production are accepted by public like productions of Warner brothers, Disney l...
^^
Line 9, column 117, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: There
...tive reviews which is also vague thing. Their is no necessitate to increase budget wi...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 328, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... Without subjective matter in the movie their is no use in increasing the budget of m...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 41, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...On other hand the super screen produced doesnt gains the prospective reviews due to th...
^^^^^^
Line 12, column 132, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...ack of budget or less production values then the production of budget should be incr...
^^^^
Line 12, column 183, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...oduction of budget should be increased. Finally the subject of movies matters whether t...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 319, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oduced may achieve prospective reviews. If author consider this assumption the arg...
^^
Line 14, column 23, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... strengthened. Therefore, the author doesnt provide any cited evidences to strength...
^^^^^^
Line 14, column 235, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ring above like assumptions. But author didnt state any such valid assumptions. Consi...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'for example', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.279491833031 0.25644967241 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.157894736842 0.15541462614 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101633393829 0.0836205057962 122% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0399274047187 0.0520304965353 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.016333938294 0.0272364105082 60% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134301270417 0.125424944231 107% => OK
Participles: 0.059891107078 0.0416121511921 144% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.69401005344 2.79052419416 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0235934664247 0.026700313972 88% => OK
Particles: 0.00181488203267 0.001811407834 100% => OK
Determiners: 0.103448275862 0.113004496875 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.021778584392 0.0255425247493 85% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.016333938294 0.0127820249294 128% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3233.0 2731.13054187 118% => OK
No of words: 507.0 446.07635468 114% => OK
Chars per words: 6.37672583826 6.12365571057 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.57801047555 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.439842209073 0.378187486979 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.30966469428 0.287650121315 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.22090729783 0.208842608468 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.147928994083 0.135150697306 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69401005344 2.79052419416 97% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 207.018472906 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.400394477318 0.469332199767 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.4271787898 52.1807786196 87% => OK
How many sentences: 32.0 20.039408867 160% => OK
Sentence length: 15.84375 23.2022227129 68% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4164720249 57.7814097925 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.03125 141.986410481 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.84375 23.2022227129 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.40625 0.724660767414 56% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.14285714286 136% => OK
Language errors: 19.0 3.58251231527 530% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 46.810219428 51.9672348444 90% => OK
Elegance: 2.21186440678 1.8405768891 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393277162764 0.441005458295 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0928549333031 0.135418324435 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0720848395386 0.0829849096947 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.495944620641 0.58762219726 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.152789071305 0.147661913831 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127433493251 0.193483328276 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905282846269 0.0970749176394 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.342365425155 0.42659136922 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0952263879639 0.0774707102158 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240930432417 0.312017818177 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800697531524 0.0698173142475 115% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.33743842365 204% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.87684729064 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.82512315271 145% => OK
Positive topic words: 15.0 6.46551724138 232% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.82389162562 177% => OK
Total topic words: 23.0 14.657635468 157% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.