In an attempt to improve highway safety Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways But this effort has failed the number of accidents has not decreased and based on reports by the highway patrol man

Essay topics:

In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patrol, many drivers are exceeding the speed limit. Prunty County should instead undertake the same kind of road improvement project that Butler County completed five years ago: increasing lane widths, resurfacing rough highways, and improving visibility at dangerous intersections. Today, major Butler County roads still have a 55 mph speed limit, yet there were 25 percent fewer reported accidents in Butler County this past year than there were five years ago.

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

While it is true that highway safety must be improved at Prunty County as there is high accident rate, this author’s argument does not make a cogent case for emulating Prunty County with Bulter County. According to the author, to improve safety at Prunty County they should undertake the project which has already completed by Bulter County. While the correlations could be logical and probable, there may be hidden factors that are responsible for no improvement in highway safety.

The author’s first mistake is to assume that the speed limit is the cause of most of the accident. He claims...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (6 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Sentence: This is the classical case of confusing correlation with causion.
Error: causion Suggestion: caution

argument 1 -- OK

argument 2 -- not OK. We have to accept all data from the topic are true.

argument 3 -- OK

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 462 350
No. of Characters: 2292 1500
No. of Different Words: 201 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.636 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.961 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.527 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 188 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 74 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.576 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.476 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.317 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.52 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.094 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5