"Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indicating that 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change. Furthermore, many servers have reported that a number of customers who ask for butter do not complain when they are given margarine instead. Clearly, either these customers cannot distinguish butter from margarine or they use the term 'butter' to refer to either butter or margarine. Thus, to avoid the expense of purchasing butter and to increase profitability, the Happy Pancake House should extend this cost-saving change to its restaurants in the southeast and northeast as well."
The author in the above argument has made conclusion with the number of the assumption. The author concludes to abandon butter which will increase in the cost savings in the southeast as well as in northeast. There many discrete assumptions taken which hamper human reading ability to believe. There seems many loop in the above argument. Further, I would like to demonstrate it above.
First of all, the author readily assumes that it will be cost saving effect without any specific evidence southeast as well as northeast. There many assumptions without any solid ground. For example, the author in the preceding paragraph says that 2% of the customer have complain about it that implies 98coustmer are happy with the change which sound very unjustified. As there in no proper information about 2% from how many customers. Moreover, a proper statistical information must be given to get justified the author’s view about it. So to enforce the conclusion, the write must suggest strong evidence without any assumption.
Furthermore, in order to save the cost, the author says that the person who ask for the butter are given margarine. Hence, this is the way of cheating the customer. Moreover, there may adverse effect due to this. The costumer may further not visit the store. Costumer are called the king of the market and to cheat them can give harmful effect. Thus this is also the unappropriated suggestion given by the author.
Lastly, the author has come out with conclusion to eliminate the butter for the profitability. There are many other ways also to increase profitability. To cheat the costumer is not genuine. Moreover, the author suggests to do in the northeast as well as which is also sounding without any ground. As the action with the intention of the greed is always harmful. The profit will be earned, if we serve well. But this unrealistic suggestion given by the author.
On conclusion, there seems many loop with the author’s view. To wrap up my discussion over this argument, I would like to say the above argument contains many flaws with that of the illogical assumption taken by the writer. There seems no major reason for the evidence. It would have better if writer provides strong evidence for its conclusion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun loop seems to be countable; consider using: 'many loops'.
Suggestion: many loops
...reading ability to believe. There seems many loop in the above argument. Further, I would...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'complained'.
Suggestion: complained
...graph says that 2% of the customer have complain about it that implies 98coustmer are ha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 370, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he change which sound very unjustified. As there in no proper information about 2%...
^^
Line 2, column 575, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...about it. So to enforce the conclusion, the write must suggest strong evidence without an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... to cheat them can give harmful effect. Thus this is also the unappropriated suggest...
^^^^
Line 4, column 212, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests doing'.
Suggestion: suggests doing
...er is not genuine. Moreover, the author suggests to do in the northeast as well as which is al...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 261, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...to do in the northeast as well as which is also sounding without any ground. As the action with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ch is also sounding without any ground. As the action with the intention of the gr...
^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun loop seems to be countable; consider using: 'many loops'.
Suggestion: many loops
...the author. On conclusion, there seems many loop with the author's view. To wrap up...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'lastly', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'as well as', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.214452214452 0.25644967241 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.16317016317 0.15541462614 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0745920745921 0.0836205057962 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0512820512821 0.0520304965353 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.025641025641 0.0272364105082 94% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121212121212 0.125424944231 97% => OK
Participles: 0.041958041958 0.0416121511921 101% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71825445099 2.79052419416 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.032634032634 0.026700313972 122% => OK
Particles: 0.004662004662 0.001811407834 257% => OK
Determiners: 0.132867132867 0.113004496875 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.025641025641 0.0255425247493 100% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.013986013986 0.0127820249294 109% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2258.0 2731.13054187 83% => OK
No of words: 377.0 446.07635468 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98938992042 6.12365571057 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.57801047555 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.336870026525 0.378187486979 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.25198938992 0.287650121315 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.188328912467 0.208842608468 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.124668435013 0.135150697306 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71825445099 2.79052419416 97% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 207.018472906 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490716180371 0.469332199767 105% => OK
Word variations: 52.3441005247 52.1807786196 100% => OK
How many sentences: 28.0 20.039408867 140% => OK
Sentence length: 13.4642857143 23.2022227129 58% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9772923976 57.7814097925 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.6428571429 141.986410481 57% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4642857143 23.2022227129 58% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.535714285714 0.724660767414 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 3.58251231527 251% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 38.6632247063 51.9672348444 74% => OK
Elegance: 1.57281553398 1.8405768891 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305408488082 0.441005458295 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.110943016691 0.135418324435 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0625675332918 0.0829849096947 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.498058606183 0.58762219726 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156968445027 0.147661913831 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112519010141 0.193483328276 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077435072993 0.0970749176394 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.486093834556 0.42659136922 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.10089238278 0.0774707102158 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220447766323 0.312017818177 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248973653708 0.0698173142475 36% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.33743842365 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.87684729064 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 6.46551724138 170% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.