The Claitown University proposal-to build toursitic, affordable housing based on revenues from future tourists as well as denotions from its graduates students-- is not completely convincing as it dearths for certain crcial loopholes.
First of all, although, the Claitown university needs to make the housing affordable for its students, it claims that they need a famous architect so that the building appear futuristic. But the argument leaves many an unaswered assumptions. For examble, a well-known architect engineer means additional costs which may not be afforded by the university budget. Moreover, the arguer never states How much cost will it cost by that architect engineer? or propose another solutions. May be there are another architects--who are not famous-- but are less in price with higher quality in designs. Therefore, Evenif depending on a well-known architect is a attractive idea, but that weaken rather support the claim made by council.
Also, The argument claims without warrant that depending on future funding from tourists-who expexted to come and see the new building--will cover the expenses of establishing the new building. The university does not provide any conspicious evidence to support that tourists will be interested in visting its building. In other word; toursits may see the building as conventional or there are what can be considered better than Claitown`s building.
Morover, the author stated that the building will be larger than their current needing. Larger means more expenses. Also, the argument never states the total expected cost to make that building or the projected profit from tourists or even alumni donations.In addition, the argument assumes that the well-known architect will accept the offer and wait for tourists to come to take his money back.
In conclusion, the argument made by the Claiton university does not completely convince me that the it would be a reasonable idea to build such proposed building. Ultimately, the argument would have been stenghened if the arguer states the expected cost to establish the building. Also, the future revenue that they predict form tourists visits besides the donations. Additionally, but most importantly, the university may think of other soelutions such as building extra floor to cover up the increase in current students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...futuristic. But the argument leaves many an unaswered assumptions. For examble, a...
^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... means additional costs which may not be afforded by the university budget. Moreo...
^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Or
...ill it cost by that architect engineer? or propose another solutions. May be there...
^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mous-- but are less in price with higher quality in designs. Therefore, Evenif de...
^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... depending on a well-known architect is a attractive idea, but that weaken rather...
^
Line 3, column 703, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive idea, but that weaken rather support the claim made by council. Also, The ar...
^^
Line 4, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...claims without warrant that depending on future funding from tourists-who expexte...
^^
Line 4, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...versity does not provide any conspicious evidence to support that tourists will b...
^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g. Larger means more expenses. Also, the argument never states the total expected...
^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... from tourists or even alumni donations.In addition, the argument assumes that the...
^^
Line 6, column 97, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...ty does not completely convince me that the it would be a reasonable idea to build su...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce me that the it would be a reasonable idea to build such proposed building. Ul...
^^
Line 6, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ghened if the arguer states the expected cost to establish the building. Also, th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 2260.96107784 88% => OK
No of words: 363.0 441.139720559 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4738292011 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92772280749 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 204.123752495 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526170798898 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.76447105788 148% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6169386882 57.8364921388 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.388888889 119.503703932 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.324526521 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.70786347227 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.25449101796 247% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221891017871 0.218282227539 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664835822801 0.0743258471296 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784986530426 0.0701772020484 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129631292547 0.128457276422 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069924991989 0.0628817314937 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.3799401198 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.3550499002 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.5979740519 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 98.500998004 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.