The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station.
"To reverse a decline in listener numbers, our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock-music format. The decline has occurred despite population growth in our listening area, but that growth has resulted mainly from people moving here after their retirement. We must make listeners of these new residents. We could switch to a music format tailored to their tastes, but a continuing decline in local sales of recorded music suggests limited interest in music. Instead we should change to a news and talk format, a form of radio that is increasingly popular in our area."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The team of radio station wants to change the radio program from rock-music to news and talk format. this desition has flawed because of some problem such as: how they figure it out what is popular?How will they know what the listener wants? and the fewer sales cannot lead to less popular.
Firstly, what is popular in one society people spend a huge amount of time in the internet and some of them by the new album from this places instead of local market. Since it is much easier to buy it online. On the other hand, In some country people just download what they want, this never mean they do not care about the artist or art. they just are stingy in these areas. So if people buy less than before perhaps this is just for developing the technology. and not because of the rate of interest in ganr
Secondly, there is not a straightforward for communcation between radio owner and the listener. in nowaday's life, there are vast way of communication such as email, yahoo chat and google talk that help people to communicate or even with cell phone they easily talk and negotiate about programs. For example In VOA channel they use "Telegram" and "Skype" for sharing their thought. Therefor, they should thank about a way that citizen communicate easily.
Thirdly, how they now new population like to live in this place permanently. This is not sinceable that camplany change their program for nothing. perhaps after spending huge amount of money on changing to news and talk program. people tells they like to old program rather than the new one.
In conclusion, For changing the program in one radio station, they need more evidence and consideration among whole things. They should be think about the meaning of pupolarity, the needs of the permanent citizen and the way to talk sirectly to listener.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...rom rock-music to news and talk format. this desition has flawed because of some pro...
^^^^
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: How
... how they figure it out what is popular?How will they know what the listener wants?...
^^^
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...will they know what the listener wants? and the fewer sales cannot lead to less pop...
^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... and some of them by the new album from this places instead of local market. Since i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...om this places instead of local market. Since it is much easier to buy it online. On ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ey do not care about the artist or art. they just are stingy in these areas. So if p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... is just for developing the technology. and not because of the rate of interest in ...
^^^
Line 3, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... because of the rate of interest in ganr Secondly, there is not a straightforward...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...n between radio owner and the listener. in nowadays life, there are vast way of co...
^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...n between radio owner and the listener. in nowadays life, there are vast way of communicati...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Perhaps
...plany change their program for nothing. perhaps after spending huge amount of money on ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...y on changing to news and talk program. people tells they like to old program rather t...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'thought'?
Suggestion: thought
...tion among whole things. They should be think about the meaning of pupolarity, the ne...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 55.5748502994 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 2260.96107784 67% => OK
No of words: 315.0 441.139720559 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83492063492 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64594366694 2.78398813304 95% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 204.123752495 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552380952381 0.468620217663 118% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 705.55239521 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.471057884232 637% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9016858981 57.8364921388 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6111111111 119.503703932 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.70786347227 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.25449101796 247% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0884919589761 0.218282227539 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031912489651 0.0743258471296 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577952464946 0.0701772020484 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0562530601148 0.128457276422 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389034234698 0.0628817314937 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.3799401198 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.3550499002 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.197005988 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.5979740519 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 98.500998004 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.