The following appeared as part of an article in a magazine devoted to regional
life.
“Corporations should look to the city of Helios when seeking new business
opportunities or a new location. Even in the recent recession, Helios’s
unemployment rate was lower than the regional average. It is the industrial center
of the region, and historically it has provided more than its share of the region’s
manufacturing jobs. In addition, Helios is attempting to expand its economic base
by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative
technologies.”
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
In this argument corporations are urged to consider the city of Helios when seeking a new location or new business opportunities. To
support this recommendation, the author points out that Helios is the industrial center of the region, providing most of the region’s
manufacturing jobs and enjoying a lower-than-average unemployment rate. Moreover, it is argued, efforts are currently underway to
expand the economic base of the city by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies. This
argument is problematic for two reasons
To begin with, it is questionable whether the available labor pool in Helios could support all types of corporations. Given that Helios has
attracted mainly industrial and manufacturing companies in the past, it is unlikely that the local pool of prospective employees would be
suitable for corporations of other types. For example, the needs of research and development companies would not be met by a labor
force trained in manufacturing skills. For this reason, it’s unlikely that Helios will be successful in its attempt to attract companies that
focus or research and development of innovative technologies.
Discourse Markers used:
['moreover', 'so', 'for example', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.268292682927 0.25644967241 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.160975609756 0.15541462614 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0975609756098 0.0836205057962 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.019512195122 0.0520304965353 38% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0243902439024 0.0272364105082 90% => OK
Prepositions: 0.131707317073 0.125424944231 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0487804878049 0.0416121511921 117% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.44258284509 2.79052419416 123% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0243902439024 0.026700313972 91% => OK
Particles: 0.00487804878049 0.001811407834 269% => OK
Determiners: 0.0975609756098 0.113004496875 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.019512195122 0.0255425247493 76% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0146341463415 0.0127820249294 114% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1203.0 2731.13054187 44% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 182.0 446.07635468 41% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.60989010989 6.12365571057 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 4.57801047555 80% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.412087912088 0.378187486979 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.351648351648 0.287650121315 122% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.28021978022 0.208842608468 134% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.197802197802 0.135150697306 146% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44258284509 2.79052419416 123% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 207.018472906 49% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554945054945 0.469332199767 118% => OK
Word variations: 48.5435021455 52.1807786196 93% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 20.039408867 35% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.2022227129 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2227023631 57.7814097925 54% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.857142857 141.986410481 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.2022227129 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.724660767414 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 5.14285714286 194% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.58251231527 0% => OK
Readability: 61.1648351648 51.9672348444 118% => OK
Elegance: 2.19047619048 1.8405768891 119% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386550488934 0.441005458295 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.182988493672 0.135418324435 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0546011444372 0.0829849096947 66% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.711597895998 0.58762219726 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.283352471733 0.147661913831 192% => Sentences are changing often in a paragraphs.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.22292664867 0.193483328276 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992915481173 0.0970749176394 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.0831525449484 0.42659136922 19% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0812236217008 0.0774707102158 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170003757242 0.312017818177 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123503385095 0.0698173142475 177% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.87684729064 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.82512315271 21% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 5.36822660099 19% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 14.657635468 48% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.