The following is an excerpt from a letter sent by the principal of Greenwood School to the parents of all incoming kindergartners.
"We have decided to institute a policy of all-day kindergarten, instead of half-day kindergarten, for all students at Greenwood School. All-day kindergarten will help all our students achieve at their highest levels. The classes will be 'tracked'; so that average students are together, but high-achieving and low-achieving students will be put together in classes. In this way, the high-achieving students will be able to help pull the low-achieving students up to their level, so that no student falls behind. The all-day kindergarten classes will cover the same material previously covered in the half-day kindergarten classes, but will go at a slower speed to accommodate learning differences. In addition, the students will receive extra instruction in music, art, and physical education. One of the greatest benefits of the plan, however, is that students will be in a structured environment for longer hours, reducing the numbers of hours that otherwise would be wasted at home or in day care."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
There is a dispute about a new policy of a kindergarten suggesting an all-day program and dividing children into sections according to their levels. Even this plan have prospect of achieving positive and efficient contributions, there are serious consequences of this application further than their aims in overall. Before taking such action, they should take into account these overlooked negative outcomes distinctly.
Firstly, one misjudgment is that spending time at home is not totally waste of time since parent care is also essential during childhood. As we know, sense of attention and care is so vital that they mainly shape your future characters. For instance, a child who has grown up with reluctant parents may be a defident adult as a result rooted from habits belonging to childhood times in order to get attraction. To put it another way, interrupting this need of parent care may damage their psychology even they spend their time more efficiently.
Secondly, another logical fallacy is that idea of covering materials at a slower speed is a torture for high-achieving students since they can understand and concentrate more rapidly and it is waste of time to wait other children and school ending. In addition, this may be distract them from other art, music and physical lessons due to discouraging their arouse. Schools should give incentive and curiosity to see further, not create indolent individuals from already curious ones with unnecessary burden of responsibilities.
Thirdly, last fallacy worth to mention is that gathering low and high achieving students may have one more implication which turn high achieving ones into low ones. They get lazy and no need to struggle more after seeing them. In many cases, students find easy to become lazy when they see their friends can do that and why can not they do?
Lastly, I recommend to conduct a survey for parents whether they would like to such all-day school or not. After this, they should get help from professional pedagogists and introduce their plan and ask if it is viable or not. Even all results show that it is a good plan then they should revise their plan to ameliorate. For instance, they should divide classes according to exact three levels including high, medium and low. Furthermore, they should shorten school time for high levels or increase art and music lesson in order to give willingness.
In conlusion, all these misjudgement and fallacies should be considered before progress, by extension, they should follow these suggested recommendation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... essential during childhood. As we know, sense of attention and care is so vital ...
^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...econdly, another logical fallacy is that idea of covering materials at a slower s...
^^
Line 11, column 19, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this misjudgement' or 'these misjudgements'?
Suggestion: this misjudgement; these misjudgements
...give willingness. In conlusion, all these misjudgement and fallacies should be considered befo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, for instance, in addition, as a result, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 11.1786427146 170% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 28.8173652695 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2147.0 2260.96107784 95% => OK
No of words: 414.0 441.139720559 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18599033816 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80428124934 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 204.123752495 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57729468599 0.468620217663 123% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 705.55239521 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6946796187 57.8364921388 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 119.503703932 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7894736842 23.324526521 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42105263158 5.70786347227 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149842501561 0.218282227539 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495918044302 0.0743258471296 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058801186468 0.0701772020484 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792713448439 0.128457276422 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357778624061 0.0628817314937 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 98.500998004 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.