Get-Away Airlines director has concluded that it would be a wise investment if their mechanics
attended a Quality-Care Seminar. However, the argument is not completely convincing, since it lacks for many crucial assumptions.
Fisrt of all, the director suggests that the mechanics perfromance would be improved if the company invested on them to go to Quality-Care Seminar. However, This is merely assumption without solid ground. Because the director did not state if really the company`s crew is in a need to such training? As they might be qualified enough and that seminar would be not only a waste of time but also of money.
Secondly, the arguer states that two-week seminar would be enough to increase efficiency of the crew. However, a careful scrutiny of the evidence reveal that it provides little credible support of the authors`s conclusion in several critical aspects, and raises many skeptical questions. Like if really two-weeks would be enough time to boost the workers experience? Another thing to mention, the director believed that 2-week seminar training would help greater customers satisfaction. But how customers would become satisfied, I think travellers satisfaction come from other aspects such as the degree of safety that the company introduce and the service on the plane itself. Therefore, 2 week seminar would have no releation with customer blithe.
Thirdly, the director depends on assumption made by autombile racing industry report its maintenance crews perfrom better after they attend the seminar. This is again a week and unsupported claim as it does not demonstarte the releation between autombile industry and Air line company. As the two are completely different in maintenace their engines. Therefore, depending on such report does little to support the conclusion.
To sum up, the director has not completely convinced me of his recommendation. Ultimately, the argument would have been strengthened, if the author had shown if it would be beneficial for the crew to take such maintenance course? Also, the arguer should depend on reliable sources to choose the best training center.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 469, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'customers'' or 'customer's'?
Suggestion: customers'; customer's
...eek seminar training would help greater customers satisfaction. But how customers would b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 702, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'seminar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'seminars'.
Suggestion: seminars
... on the plane itself. Therefore, 2 week seminar would have no releation with customer b...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 756, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have no releation with customer blithe. Thirdly, the director depends on assumpt...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 287, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...utombile industry and Air line company. As the two are completely different in mai...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, another thing, i think, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 2260.96107784 81% => OK
No of words: 335.0 441.139720559 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43582089552 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94302623682 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 204.123752495 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.468620217663 121% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 705.55239521 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2774772816 57.8364921388 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8421052632 119.503703932 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6315789474 23.324526521 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78947368421 5.70786347227 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143261885007 0.218282227539 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450621881952 0.0743258471296 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066038900859 0.0701772020484 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975370538705 0.128457276422 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674199609927 0.0628817314937 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.5979740519 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 98.500998004 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.