An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The argument states an international development organization has developed a new breed of millet which is high in Vitamin A which will help to combat the Vitamin A deficiency among the people of Tagus. Here, the author assumes that majority of people of Tagus must have Vitamin A deficiency as it is a impoverished nation. So the first question to be answered is 'Do the people of Tagus have Vitamin A deficiency?'
The author even suggests that the white seeds of millet cost more so government should provide more subsidies and encourage the farmers to cultivate new variety of crops. The assumption over here is that there is plenty of suitable land and soil for cultivation of this new variety and even the climate is suitable. But the question arises, 'Does the nation have abundant land to farm these new crops with the suitable soil and climate conditions required for it?'
It is said that millet consists Vitamin A in higher amount and will help in combating the Vitamin A deficiency in the people of Tagus. 'But is it suitable to consume in higher proportions or will there be any side effects due to over consumption of it?' There might be some other constituents in it which might be harmful for a human's health and undermines the author's point.
Even if the government somehow manages to produce millet in a substantiate quantity, will the people of Tagus like this new variety of food? Will the market cost of the food be affordable to each and every person of Tagus? These are necessary questions that need to be considered.
It is stated that since millet is a staple food, people will readily accept it. Here it is assumed that the people of Tagus like eating staple food. So, do people like staple food?
The author urges the government to promote this new variety without knowing how much it is required
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...must have Vitamin A deficiency as it is a impoverished nation. So the first quest...
^
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: Done
...So the first question to be answered is Do the people of Tagus have Vitamin A defi...
^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ents in it which might be harmful for a humans health and undermines the authors point...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nt somehow manages to produce millet in a substantiate quantity, will the people of Tagus like...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.274336283186 0.25644967241 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.171091445428 0.15541462614 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0796460176991 0.0836205057962 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0324483775811 0.0520304965353 62% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0294985250737 0.0272364105082 108% => OK
Prepositions: 0.129793510324 0.125424944231 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0324483775811 0.0416121511921 78% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58705600196 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0294985250737 0.026700313972 110% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.115044247788 0.113004496875 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0294985250737 0.0255425247493 115% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0147492625369 0.0127820249294 115% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1825.0 2731.13054187 67% => OK
No of words: 319.0 446.07635468 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7210031348 6.12365571057 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.57801047555 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.347962382445 0.378187486979 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.225705329154 0.287650121315 78% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.134796238245 0.208842608468 65% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0940438871473 0.135150697306 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58705600196 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 207.018472906 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460815047022 0.469332199767 98% => OK
Word variations: 45.7224051719 52.1807786196 88% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.039408867 80% => OK
Sentence length: 19.9375 23.2022227129 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8233562878 57.7814097925 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0625 141.986410481 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 23.2022227129 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.25 0.724660767414 34% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 42.5080329154 51.9672348444 82% => OK
Elegance: 1.87341772152 1.8405768891 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.485933089992 0.441005458295 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.200149134889 0.135418324435 148% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.127362401399 0.0829849096947 153% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.694044711593 0.58762219726 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140916570051 0.147661913831 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203259596567 0.193483328276 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138128690126 0.0970749176394 142% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.271732349114 0.42659136922 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0841952386958 0.0774707102158 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280394694374 0.312017818177 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148433192407 0.0698173142475 213% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.33743842365 120% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.87684729064 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.82512315271 104% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 6.46551724138 155% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 5.36822660099 19% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 14.657635468 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.