Our work proves to be very successful. In the past three years, each of our five clients has
experienced the fastest growth of sales in their history. Therefore, if your company meets
management problems, do not hesitate to call Sigma, since we are the best management
consulting company.
The argument that Sigma' consultancy is very successful is based on the unprecedented
performance of Sigma's past five clients. The author tried to convey that Sigma's consulting
helped its clients increasing their business volume. While the line of reasoning is somewhat
persuasive, it committed the Insufficient Sample Fallacy and therefore is logically not sound.
First of all, the argument commits the Insufficient Sample Faulty. The author made conclusion
that its clients achieved the greatest increase in sales by illustrating only five of their clients. It is
possible that the majority of their clients did not experience the mentioned growth of sales. So, the
author should address more clients so as to generate the conclusion for its success of consulting
job.
Second, the author made a wrong comparison. When the arguer tried to prove that their clients
performed better than other companies, he committed an even more serious fallacy by comparing
its current performance with historical performance. Rather, the author should compare its clients'
performance with that of other companies.
Finally, the argument potentially assumed that the consultancy is the only factor that determines
the success of its clients. Actually, it may be other factors that constitute to the success of these
five clients. For example, the board of directors just reappointed a new CEO who has proved
successful in his past years of managing career and possess resourceful experience in this kind
of industry. Without eliminating other factors, the argument is not sound. Moreover, even if Sigma
really proves successful to help its clients in regain wonderful sales history, it does not guarantee
its superiority of solving management problems since management is only one of the functions
that a company daily encounter and a consulting company can help to solve.
In sum, the argument is neither sound nor convincing since it overlooks many possibilities that
must be addressed to strengthen its statement. If it included the items described above, it may be
more strong or persuasive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The argument that Sigma consultancy is v...
^^^^
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...successful is based on the unprecedented performance of Sigmas past five clients....
^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r tried to convey that Sigmas consulting helped its clients increasing their busi...
^^^
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... While the line of reasoning is somewhat persuasive, it committed the Insufficien...
^^^
Line 6, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ample Faulty. The author made conclusion that its clients achieved the greatest i...
^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rating only five of their clients. It is possible that the majority of their clie...
^^^
Line 8, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the mentioned growth of sales. So, the author should address more clients so as...
^^^
Line 9, column 36, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...he author should address more clients so as to generate the conclusion for its success...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conclusion for its success of consulting job. Second, the author made a wrong...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n for its success of consulting job. Second, the author made a wrong comparis...
^^^
Line 12, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arguer tried to prove that their clients performed better than other companies, h...
^^^
Line 13, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n even more serious fallacy by comparing its current performance with historical ...
^^^
Line 14, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r, the author should compare its clients performance with that of other companies...
^^^
Line 16, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...formance with that of other companies. Finally, the argument potentially assume...
^^^
Line 17, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tancy is the only factor that determines the success of its clients. Actually, it...
^^^
Line 18, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that constitute to the success of these five clients. For example, the board of ...
^^^
Line 19, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ust reappointed a new CEO who has proved successful in his past years of managing...
^^^
Line 20, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sess resourceful experience in this kind of industry. Without eliminating other f...
^^^
Line 21, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt is not sound. Moreover, even if Sigma really proves successful to help its cli...
^^^
Line 22, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ful sales history, it does not guarantee its superiority of solving management pr...
^^^
Line 23, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... management is only one of the functions that a company daily encounter and a con...
^^^
Line 25, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... consulting company can help to solve. In sum, the argument is neither sound no...
^^^
Line 26, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce it overlooks many possibilities that must be addressed to strengthen its stat...
^^^
Line 27, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ded the items described above, it may be more strong or persuasive.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, if, look, may, moreover, really, second, so, then, therefore, while, as to, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 28.8173652695 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 2260.96107784 80% => OK
No of words: 326.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53987730061 5.12650576532 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91513059315 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 204.123752495 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530674846626 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 705.55239521 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.76447105788 137% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.7289147113 57.8364921388 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.235294118 119.503703932 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 5.70786347227 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 23.0 5.15768463074 446% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 24.0 5.25449101796 457% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149239198274 0.218282227539 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488886676839 0.0743258471296 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449664243717 0.0701772020484 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0443545133232 0.128457276422 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396903784707 0.0628817314937 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.5979740519 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 98.500998004 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.