Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they become
more efficient. In color film processing, for example, the cost of a 3-by-5-inch print fell from 50 cents for five-day
service in 1970 to 20 cents for one-day service in 1984. The same principle applies to the processing of food. And
since Olympic Foods will soon celebrate its 25th birthday, we can expect that our long experience will enable us to
minimize costs and thus maximize profits
The argument is stating that over time, the costs of processing for an organization goes down as its efficiency increases. Argument is based upon sole example of color film processing industry, where costs of processing decreased with time. It is stated that Olympic Foods will be able soon minimize its costs and hence, maximize its profits.
There are various factors that decides the overall costs of processing, argument should take into consideration all the factors before coming to a strong conclusion and predicting whether the costs of processing will go down with time or whether cost will remain same or increase. According to the argument, in case of color fill processing there was huge decrease in total processing costs for 3-by-5 print from 1970 to 1984. Which seems to be a sound premise to come to conclusion that profits for Olympic foods could be increased. But, innovation could have resulted in reducing overall processing costs and not the experience gained during this time. In 1970, may be 90% of the total processing cost was because of labor charges and now in 1984 new technology resulted in reduced labor requirement, hence, reducing the total costs of processing. If this is the factor, then same innovation can't help Olympic food reduce its cost and thus maximize profits. There may be other factors causing reduced total processing cost, like: new technology may have reduce total wastage during the film processing, hence reduced total processing cost. Same factor can not lead to reduced cost for Olympic foods. By 25th birthday, cost of labor is increased by tremendous amount for Olympic food and also other cost like that of machinery required for processing is increased, raw material cost is increased, electricity charges are also increased. All these factors should also be taken into account when calculating overall profits, profits is not not solely dependent upon processing cost, it depends upon lot of other factors as stated above. All these factors will lead to increase in reduced profits if selling price is not increased by 25th birthday.
There may be other factors that effects to overall profits like increase in market competition, which will force Olympic Food to reduce its selling price, affecting its overall profits, hence make this argument completely illogical. Olympic food could be able to reduce its total costs of processing but market competition and some exigency can affect its overall profit. By 25th birthday, Olympic food may run some promotion campaign in-order to attract more customers or to retain existing customers, affecting its bottom line and its profits. Therefore, multitude of factors ranging from increase in labor cost, electricity charges, cost of raw material, shop rent etc. can affect total profits of Olympic foods. Hence, it can be concluded based upon the analysis and various reasons stated above that reduction in processing cost does not guarantee increased profits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 895, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...his is the factor, then same innovation cant help Olympic food reduce its cost and t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1057, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
...ing cost, like: new technology may have reduce total wastage during the film processin...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st is increased, electricity charges are also increased. All these factors should...
^^
Line 3, column 1538, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: not
...calculating overall profits, profits is not not solely dependent upon processing cost, ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.293333333333 0.25644967241 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.173333333333 0.15541462614 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.08 0.0836205057962 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0380952380952 0.0520304965353 73% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0247619047619 0.0272364105082 91% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121904761905 0.125424944231 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0666666666667 0.0416121511921 160% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58567277381 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0247619047619 0.026700313972 93% => OK
Particles: 0.00190476190476 0.001811407834 105% => OK
Determiners: 0.047619047619 0.113004496875 42% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0361904761905 0.0255425247493 142% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0114285714286 0.0127820249294 89% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2969.0 2731.13054187 109% => OK
No of words: 476.0 446.07635468 107% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23739495798 6.12365571057 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.57801047555 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.386554621849 0.378187486979 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.317226890756 0.287650121315 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.199579831933 0.208842608468 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138655462185 0.135150697306 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58567277381 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 207.018472906 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430672268908 0.469332199767 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.1404085432 52.1807786196 92% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.039408867 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.8 23.2022227129 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1371438927 57.7814097925 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.45 141.986410481 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 23.2022227129 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.45 0.724660767414 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.14285714286 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 55.5226890756 51.9672348444 107% => OK
Elegance: 2.04032258065 1.8405768891 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348614186562 0.441005458295 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.156860309364 0.135418324435 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0874276780759 0.0829849096947 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.454247678649 0.58762219726 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.115876460195 0.147661913831 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14179741896 0.193483328276 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944417715496 0.0970749176394 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.459121378504 0.42659136922 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0688906305095 0.0774707102158 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261097718428 0.312017818177 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760941645248 0.0698173142475 109% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.33743842365 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 6.46551724138 201% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 14.657635468 116% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.