Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they become
more efficient. In color film processing, for example, the cost of a 3-by-5-inch print fell from 50 cents for five-day
service in 1970 to 20 cents for one-day service in 1984. The same principle applies to the processing of food. And
since Olympic Foods will soon celebrate its 25th birthday, we can expect that our long experience will enable us to
minimize costs and thus maximize profits
The argument is stating that over time, the costs of processing for an organization goes down as its efficiency increases. Argument is based upon sole example of color film processing industry, where costs of processing decreased with time because the company learnt how to do things better.It is stated that Olympic Foods will be able soon minimize its costs and hence, maximize its profits based upon the above premise.
There are various factors that decides the overall costs of processing, argument should take into consideration all the factors before coming to a strong conclusion and predicting whether the costs of processing will go down with time or whether it will remain same or increase. According to the argument, in case of color fill processing there was huge decrease in total processing costs for 3-by-5 print from 1970 to 1984, Which seems to be a sound premise to come to conclusion that profits for Olympic foods could also be increased. But, innovation could have resulted in reducing overall processing costs and not the experience gained during this time. In 1970, may be 90% of the total processing cost was because of labor charges and now in 1984 innovation resulted in reduced labor requirement, hence, reducing the total costs of processing. If this is the factor, then same innovation can not help Olympic food reduce its cost and thus maximize its profits.
There may be other factors like: new technology may have reduced the total wastage during the film processing, hence reduced total processing cost, therefore profits can not be maximized for Olympic foods. Due to unforeseen circumstances by 25th birthday, me be cost of the labor is increased by tremendous amount for Olympic food and also other cost like machinery required for processing, raw material and electricity charges are also increased. All these factors should also be taken into account when calculating overall profits, which is not solely dependent upon processing costs. Profits depends upon lot of other factors as stated above and all the above factors will lead to reduced profits if selling price is not increased by 25th birthday.
There may be other factors that effects to overall profits like increase in the market competition, which will force the Olympic Food to reduce its selling price, affecting its overall profits, hence make this argument that experience helped film processing reduce total costs and same will work for the Olympic foods completely illogical. Olympic food could be able to reduce its total costs of processing but market competition and some exigency can affect its overall profit. By 25th birthday, Olympic food may run some promotion campaign in-order to attract more customers or to retain existing customers, affecting its bottom line and its profits. Therefore, multitude of factors ranging from increase in the labor cost, electricity charges, cost of raw material, shop rent etc. can affect total profits. Hence, it can be concluded based upon the analysis and various reasons stated above that reduction in processing cost does not guarantee increased profits and the argument stated precise to come to a sound conclusion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
... company learnt how to do things better.It is stated that Olympic Foods will be ab...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.283662477558 0.25644967241 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.175942549372 0.15541462614 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0789946140036 0.0836205057962 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0394973070018 0.0520304965353 76% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0251346499102 0.0272364105082 92% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114901256732 0.125424944231 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0664272890485 0.0416121511921 160% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.59957929289 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0287253141831 0.026700313972 108% => OK
Particles: 0.00179533213645 0.001811407834 99% => OK
Determiners: 0.0610412926391 0.113004496875 54% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0377019748654 0.0255425247493 148% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0143626570916 0.0127820249294 112% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3181.0 2731.13054187 116% => OK
No of words: 512.0 446.07635468 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.212890625 6.12365571057 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.57801047555 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.37890625 0.378187486979 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.310546875 0.287650121315 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.1953125 0.208842608468 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138671875 0.135150697306 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59957929289 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 207.018472906 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.423828125 0.469332199767 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.3870338451 52.1807786196 93% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.039408867 85% => OK
Sentence length: 30.1176470588 23.2022227129 130% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.3654876875 57.7814097925 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 187.117647059 141.986410481 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1176470588 23.2022227129 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.529411764706 0.724660767414 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.58251231527 28% => OK
Readability: 61.1723345588 51.9672348444 118% => OK
Elegance: 1.9328358209 1.8405768891 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373646267542 0.441005458295 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.165950291427 0.135418324435 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0934310244246 0.0829849096947 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.5414444361 0.58762219726 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15795611569 0.147661913831 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160095893499 0.193483328276 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920212426954 0.0970749176394 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.450276725531 0.42659136922 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00331846126557 0.0774707102158 4% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285882201249 0.312017818177 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789630356464 0.0698173142475 113% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.33743842365 180% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.87684729064 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.82512315271 21% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 13.0 6.46551724138 201% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 5.36822660099 19% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 14.657635468 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.