A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of families in Bay City are two-income families, and a nationwide study has shown that such families eat significantly fewer home-cooked meals than they did a decade ago but at the same time express more concern about healthful eating. Therefore, the new Captain Seafood restaurant that specializes in seafood should be quite popular and profitable.
The Author in the above writing asserts that people of Bay City have turned towards more to Seafood dishes in recent years. To strengthen his point, he shows the people are also concerned about healthy food and as a result of it, the new seafood restaurant will be a good opening in the town. It needs more data and clarity on the above study, which shows the people mentality about the sea food. There is lack of data about the trend of other cuisines in town.
Firstly, the increment in the consumption of seafood dishes is significant but not comparable with any other cuisine present in the town. There could be a possibility of new chefs entry in some restaurants, who are specialist in cooking seafood. But, there could be possibility of relatively more increment in consumption of any other cuisine. The other possibility to undermine the point is, people are left with fewer choices in variety of food. But if, something new will be introduced in the city, people can opt the new choice.
The second point of argument is the data, that includes the interest of the two-income families only. We can not ignore the other type of families present in the town.The families of two-income type are in majority, but the number of members in each family, possibly, less than the other type of family. That will definitely weaken the author's point in passage. The mentioned type of families eat more of outside food than home-cooked, but it an assumption of food is likely to be seafood. That also supports my first point that the families can be opting the other cuisine option more.
Moreover, the given information shows that the people are concerned about their health and looking for nutrition and healthy food. One can choose vegetarian food over seafood to follow the diet chart. So if a vegetarian restaurant will be opened next to the new captain seafood and if we consider the healthy food appetite of people, there will be more chance of the success for Vegetarian food restaurant.
Overall, the given data shows the interest of people regarding seafood, deficient and argument is not logical. Hence, the conclusion which is based on such an inconclusive argument can not be tenable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 175, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'chefs'' or 'chef's'?
Suggestion: chefs'; chef's
...wn. There could be a possibility of new chefs entry in some restaurants, who are spec...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...er type of families present in the town.The families of two-income type are in majo...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.265060240964 0.25644967241 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.130120481928 0.15541462614 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.106024096386 0.0836205057962 127% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0385542168675 0.0520304965353 74% => OK
Pronouns: 0.021686746988 0.0272364105082 80% => OK
Prepositions: 0.13734939759 0.125424944231 110% => OK
Participles: 0.033734939759 0.0416121511921 81% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.55768947086 2.79052419416 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0144578313253 0.026700313972 54% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.113253012048 0.113004496875 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0289156626506 0.0255425247493 113% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0120481927711 0.0127820249294 94% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2209.0 2731.13054187 81% => OK
No of words: 377.0 446.07635468 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85941644562 6.12365571057 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.57801047555 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.331564986737 0.378187486979 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.25198938992 0.287650121315 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.172413793103 0.208842608468 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106100795756 0.135150697306 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55768947086 2.79052419416 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 207.018472906 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456233421751 0.469332199767 97% => OK
Word variations: 47.7489400371 52.1807786196 92% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.039408867 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.8421052632 23.2022227129 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.885639846 57.7814097925 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.263157895 141.986410481 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8421052632 23.2022227129 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.684210526316 0.724660767414 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.58251231527 56% => OK
Readability: 45.0410442552 51.9672348444 87% => OK
Elegance: 2.29113924051 1.8405768891 124% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366141636876 0.441005458295 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.155083726242 0.135418324435 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0843180935163 0.0829849096947 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.61904548228 0.58762219726 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.114988782848 0.147661913831 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166290043812 0.193483328276 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063542093453 0.0970749176394 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.414565391166 0.42659136922 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.107336884982 0.0774707102158 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244565706786 0.312017818177 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668849042876 0.0698173142475 96% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.33743842365 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.82512315271 124% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 6.46551724138 124% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.82389162562 177% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.