A recent study by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention found that employees with paid sick leave are 28 percent less likely to be involved in a work-related accident than employees who do not receive payment for sick leave. Researchers hypothesiz

It is essential for an employer to keep his human resource work force at its highest efficiency. In this manner, with specific hours spent on a job, the result will be of much higher quality. However, it does not necessarily guarantee that employees with paid sick leave less likely to face with work-related accident rather than employees who do not receive payment for their sick leave.

To begin with, it should be mentioned that being paid with their sick leave by their employers, the employees will always request sick leave even for small matters, for example a couple of coughs. Furthermore, since they are sure that they will be paid for their absence, they try to stay on sick leave as long as possible. Interestingly, this alibi will become popular among lazy workers who always try to find an excuse in order to do no work.

Second point is that employees who do not get paid for their sick leave can work, although their efficiency is not as high as when they are in complete health. Accordingly, it does not mean they cannot work at all. According to the author's claim, on-the-job accidents are at its climax in occupations with high-risk circumstances like construction, but he does not point out that suck occupations are well-paid enough that release the employee from feeling compelled for fear of lack of pay.

Finally, to be honest, there exist some employees who do not receive enough salary and they do not have a lucrative job and they do not also are not paid sick leave. Not only these kind of situations are negligible, but also their employers have a special solution for these sudden events. For instance, they give dedicated number of days for normal leave most of the time about two and a half day leave per month in order to give the opportunity to their employees for investigating their out of work environment issues. According to this fact, employees can spend their normal leave on their medical checkups or they can visit a doctor when they get sick and fortunately, they do not lose any salary since they are eligible to use their normal leave on any issues.

In conclusion, I believe that paid sick leave does not completely justify researchers' hypothesize about the fact that employees with unpaid sick leave feel pressured to work during time of illness and also, there are some solutions like lucrative jobs do not feel significant stress or there are some regular days devoted to normal leave for any issue an employee may face with.

Votes
Average: 6.3 (5 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 175, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... also are not paid sick leave. Not only these kind of situations are negligible, but also ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 28.8173652695 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 55.5748502994 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 2260.96107784 91% => OK
No of words: 429.0 441.139720559 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78787878788 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53425089745 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 204.123752495 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48951048951 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 705.55239521 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.22255489022 213% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.8473053892 131% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.8092534019 57.8364921388 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.714285714 119.503703932 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6428571429 23.324526521 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.70786347227 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402366942703 0.218282227539 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164543205626 0.0743258471296 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136490196073 0.0701772020484 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276556319018 0.128457276422 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787405423594 0.0628817314937 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.3799401198 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 98.500998004 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.1389221557 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

flaws:
The arguments are not exactly correct or far away, here go the correct arguments:

https://www.testbig.com/comment/38630#comment-38630

--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ? out of 6
Category: ? Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 429 350
No. of Characters: 2010 1500
No. of Different Words: 205 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.551 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.685 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.453 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 117 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 83 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 61 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.643 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.372 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.368 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.368 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.1 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5