In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh, most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type of book most frequently checked out of each of the public libraries in Waymarsh was the mystery novel. Therefore, it can be concluded that the respondents in the first study had misrepresented their reading habits.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The following argument concludes that "the respondents in the first study had misrepresented their reading habits." This may be true, but in order to completely evaluate this argument, we need more evidence. This essay tries to explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Firstly, in the second study researchers found that " the type of book most frequently checked out of each of the public libraries in Waymarsh was the mystery novel" this raises the question that is whether the libraries have literary classic books. It is possible that public libraries in Waymarsh have not literary classics books or mystery books in public libraries are more and varied than literary classics book, so the average of who checked out mystery novels of public libraries are more than who borrow classic books. If we had evidence that the libraries in Waymarsh had not literary classics books, it would weaken the argument.
Secondly, the author state that in a study "most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material." Whether conduct more research about reading habits of Waymarsh citizens or not. Because it is possible that one research was unreliable or invalid. For example, it may personal object of researcher effects on the study. If we had evidence that lots of studies conducted on this subject and had the same result, it would strengthen the argument.
finally, are any evidence about the type of book that frequently bought in Waymarsh. It is possible that respondents did not like checked out a book from public libraries in Waymarsh and prefer to buy the book. If we had evidence that the type of book most frequently bought in Waymarsh was the mystery novel, it would strengthen the argument.
In summary, we need more evidence to completely understanding of strength and weakness of the argument. evidence such as results of more studies, availability of all type of books in the library and the rate of bought books in Waymarsh, all are needed to assess the argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 511, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...ovels of public libraries are more than who borrow classic books. If we had evidenc...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...ult, it would strengthen the argument. finally, are any evidence about the type of boo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Evidence
... strength and weakness of the argument. evidence such as results of more studies, availa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 55.5748502994 77% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 2260.96107784 76% => OK
No of words: 336.0 441.139720559 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14583333333 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7648264898 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 204.123752495 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422619047619 0.468620217663 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.4284579297 57.8364921388 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.324526521 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 5.70786347227 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296137713541 0.218282227539 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111340204032 0.0743258471296 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128119883667 0.0701772020484 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172129195296 0.128457276422 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142304322447 0.0628817314937 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.3799401198 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 98.500998004 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.