Two years ago the city council voted to prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. They claimed that skateboard users were responsible for litter and vandalism that were keeping other visitors from coming to the plaza. In the past two years, however, there has been only a small increase in the number of visitors to Central Plaza, and litter and vandalism are still problematic. Skateboarding is permitted in Monroe Park, however, and there is no problem with litter or vandalism there. In order to restore Central Plaza to its former glory, then, we recommend that the city lift its prohibition on skateboarding in the plaza.
The Editorial concludes that city should lift the ban imposed on skateboarding in the central plaza, Since their has been only a small increase in number of visitors coming to central plaza and the problem of litter and vandalism still exist.To support this argument the editorials author points out that since the skateboarding is permitted in Monroe park,their is no problem with litter or vandalism there.However, the argument relies on several doubtful assumptions, and is therefore
unpersuasive as it stands.
First, the author assumes that the skateboard users are responsible for less number of visitors in central plaza since they were responsible for litter and vandalism. However the author fails to provide the evidence that proves the less number of visitors in central plaza is because of litter and vandalism done by the skateboard users.The author ignores that their may be a increase in crime rate around central plaza area, because of which the number of visitors is less in central plaza.
Secondly,the author fails to explain how prohibiting the skateboard users will increase the number of visitors in central plaza. Author ignores that people themselves don’t like to come to plaza because there is no good eateries and shops that earlier was there but now it is being replaced by less appealing one.So in this case prohibiting the skateboard users will not impact number of visitors in central plaza.
Third, Author fails to convince me that lifting the ban is the only way, available to restore Central Plaza to its former glory, It look contradictory to the claim they have made that skateboard users were responsible for litter and vandalism that were keeping other visitors from coming to the plaza.Author ignores the other alternative available such as introduce new appealing shops and famous eateries in central park.Author should have stated people opinion about what they like to have in park, what do they dislike in park.Then author should have convinced me that the skateboard is the only reason for less number if visitors and increase in litter and vandalism
Finally, The Author points out that, since the skateboard is permitted in Monroe park, their is no problem with litter and vandalism there.However the author fails to provide the evidence that in Monroe Park number of visitors has increased because their Is no problem of litter and vandalism even if skateboarding is permitted there. So Author might be confused with cause and effect by assuming permitting skateboard reduced the litter and vandalism in Monroe Park.
In conclusion, the argument is a specious one, To strengthen the argument, the editorial’s author must provide and evidence that skateboarding and not some other factor is responsible for decline in number of visitors in central plaza.The author must also convince me that how lifting the ban on skateboarding will increase the number of visitors in central plaza. Author must provide the evidence that people are not visiting the park because of litter and vandalism.Author must also convince me that there no alternative is available to restore Central Plaza to its former glory
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...lem of litter and vandalism still exist.To support this argument the editorials au...
^^
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , their
...kateboarding is permitted in Monroe park,their is no problem with litter or vandalism ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...ateboarding is permitted in Monroe park,their is no problem with litter or vandalism ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... problem with litter or vandalism there.However, the argument relies on several doubtfu...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e responsible for litter and vandalism. However the author fails to provide the evidenc...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 338, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... vandalism done by the skateboard users.The author ignores that their may be a incr...
^^^
Line 4, column 375, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rs.The author ignores that their may be a increase in crime rate around central p...
^
Line 6, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...rs is less in central plaza. Secondly,the author fails to explain how prohibiting...
^^^^
Line 6, column 319, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...is being replaced by less appealing one.So in this case prohibiting the skateboard...
^^
Line 8, column 133, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'looks'?
Suggestion: looks
...e Central Plaza to its former glory, It look contradictory to the claim they have ma...
^^^^
Line 8, column 302, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Author
...other visitors from coming to the plaza.Author ignores the other alternative available...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 423, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Author
...ops and famous eateries in central park.Author should have stated people opinion about...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 531, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
...e in park, what do they dislike in park.Then author should have convinced me that th...
^^^^
Line 10, column 88, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...skateboard is permitted in Monroe park, their is no problem with litter and vandalism...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...problem with litter and vandalism there.However the author fails to provide the evidenc...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...problem with litter and vandalism there.However the author fails to provide the evidenc...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 250, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...umber of visitors has increased because their Is no problem of litter and vandalism e...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 241, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... in number of visitors in central plaza.The author must also convince me that how l...
^^^
Line 12, column 474, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Author
...he park because of litter and vandalism.Author must also convince me that there no alt...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, third, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 11.1786427146 170% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 13.6137724551 132% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 28.8173652695 132% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 55.5748502994 128% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2665.0 2260.96107784 118% => OK
No of words: 508.0 441.139720559 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24606299213 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.56307096286 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78710336387 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 204.123752495 88% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.352362204724 0.468620217663 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 833.4 705.55239521 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.471057884232 212% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 56.0 22.8473053892 245% => Sentence length is too long
Sentence length SD: 261.062832416 57.8364921388 451% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 296.111111111 119.503703932 248% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 56.4444444444 23.324526521 242% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 14.0 5.70786347227 245% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 19.0 5.25449101796 362% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348970496072 0.218282227539 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198799891809 0.0743258471296 267% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084533020221 0.0701772020484 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190861434567 0.128457276422 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100021070001 0.0628817314937 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.5 14.3799401198 219% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 14.64 48.3550499002 30% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 25.1 12.197005988 206% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.06 12.5979740519 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 98.500998004 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.5 12.3882235529 238% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 24.4 11.1389221557 219% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 30.0 11.9071856287 252% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.